On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
2) While John's methods for learning and reporting spam work, I've found that
the best way to do it is per-message within spamassassin, via spamd/spamc.
The "pipe" command returns MUCH faster in this config.
Interactively moving the message
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
I've been running Spamassassin on my linux server for some time, and I
use Pine to read my mail.
Hello, fellow fossil!
Aah, yonder fossils. I've found, by the way, that if you're not using
Alpine, you sure shou
Thanks, John. I'm teaching spamassassin now!
--pat--
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
Take a look under http://www.impsec.org/antispam/ for some scripting for
user-directed training in that sort of envir
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
Take a look under http://www.impsec.org/antispam/ for some scripting for
user-directed training in that sort of environment. Each user needs a
SpamAssassin-HAM and SpamAssassin-SPAM folder.
Thanks for the reply!
I do this by piping messages (either singly or in muliples) to
spamassassin -r or -k as appropriate.
You may need to enable the ability to use unix pipes, which can be
done within the pine setup, or by adding the "enable-unix-pipe-cmd" in
the feature-list section of your .pinerc.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
Take a look under http://www.impsec.org/antispam/ for some scripting for
user-directed training in that sort of environment. Each user needs a
SpamAssassin-HAM and SpamAssassin-SPAM folder.
Thanks for the reply!
I'm getting a "not found" at that address
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
I've been running Spamassassin on my linux server for some time, and I
use Pine to read my mail.
Hello, fellow fossil!
I suspect that Spamassassin isn't learning from spam that's coming
through if I don't alert it to false positives or missed spam, but
This is certainly a newbie question for all of you out there, but I
really don't know where I should be asking this.
I've been running Spamassassin on my linux server for some time, and I
use Pine to read my mail. I suspect that Spamassassin isn't learning
from spam that's coming through if I do
