On 9/7/2014 1:47 AM, Henrik K wrote:
Also there's my patch to make SA handle big blobs gracefully:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6582 Skipping
large messages is a bit of 90's mentality since technically it's
pointless.
Which reminds me I need to write a config option
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >W dniu 2014-09-05 17:55, Justin Edmands pisze:
> >>We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
>
> On 05.09.14 18:09, Adi wrote:
> >You should consider limiting SA processing to mail size
> >up to 150
I'm happily filtering all mail with SA and it did catch much of spam.
unfortunately there IS spam >256K...
On 05.09.14 18:59, Adi wrote:
Of course, but rather it is such a small percentage compared to the
good messages (bigger than 250 KB).
IMHO rather that it is not worth it to filter.
if
On 09/05/2014 09:16 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 05.09.2014, 21:56, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti:
>> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:55 -0400, Justin Edmands wrote:
>>> We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and [...]
>>> dbg: timing: total 46640 ms
>>> BUT, because the live test likely took 46
05.09.2014, 21:56, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:55 -0400, Justin Edmands wrote:
>> We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and [...]
>> dbg: timing: total 46640 ms
>> BUT, because the live test likely took 46 seconds, I think SA is
>> giving up or something simi
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:55 -0400, Justin Edmands wrote:
> We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and [...]
> dbg: timing: total 46640 ms
> BUT, because the live test likely took 46 seconds, I think SA is
> giving up or something similar. The actual email run through the live
> SA instan
Hi
>> You should consider limiting SA processing to mail size
>> up to 150-250 KB.
>>
>> very few spam messages is bigger.
>
> I'm happily filtering all mail with SA and it did catch much of spam.
> unfortunately there IS spam >256K...
Of course, but rather it is such a small percentage compare
Justin Edmands wrote:
> We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
> only a few lines of text. Upon further investigation, the email is in
> HTML with a HUGE commented out part.
I haven't seen any over 1M recently, but these have been a long-running
nuisance here. The late
W dniu 2014-09-05 17:55, Justin Edmands pisze:
We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
On 05.09.14 18:09, Adi wrote:
You should consider limiting SA processing to mail size
up to 150-250 KB.
very few spam messages is bigger.
I'm happily filtering all mail with SA
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Justin Edmands wrote:
We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
only a few lines of text. Upon further investigation, the email is in
HTML with a HUGE commented out part.
To (hopefully) bypass filters that scan only the first part of the messag
W dniu 2014-09-05 17:55, Justin Edmands pisze:
> We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
You should consider limiting SA processing to mail size
up to 150-250 KB.
very few spam messages is bigger.
Best Regards
We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
only a few lines of text. Upon further investigation, the email is in
HTML with a HUGE commented out part.
links, text, crap, and other stuff
On the command line, I manually run the message through SA and it
shows it has
12 matches
Mail list logo
