Re: Larg PDF Spam

2009-09-03 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 11:20 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote: > I'm seeing a set of spam, with some very regular easily trapped > text in their headers/body, but with large PDF files that push > the size of the mail outside the 256K limit for running SA. That's your limit. ;) The default for spamc is

Re: Larg PDF Spam

2009-09-03 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Charles Gregory wrote: I'm seeing a set of spam, with some very regular easily trapped text in their headers/body, but with large PDF files that push the size of the mail outside the 256K limit for running SA. Anyone have any experience raising that limit? How high can we

Larg PDF Spam

2009-09-03 Thread Charles Gregory
I'm seeing a set of spam, with some very regular easily trapped text in their headers/body, but with large PDF files that push the size of the mail outside the 256K limit for running SA. Anyone have any experience raising that limit? How high can we go before it really starts to impact performan