Re: KAM.cf ham

2007-05-03 Thread kshatriyak
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote: I guess this doesn't hurt, but Bayes should already handle it. Most mails on my server are BAYES_00, since there is practically no spam in our language. Well, I don't entirely agree. In theory bayes can handle things ofcourse, but I have words in my m

Re: KAM.cf ham

2007-05-02 Thread kshatriya
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I had a reservation department not receive a confirmation notice at a hotel because the confirmation number in both the header and body started with 920 :\ Except for fixing this specific rule, I strongly advice you to write "negative" rules as w

Re: KAM.cf ham

2007-05-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Someone just had some ham get hit by KAM.cf. Why would the rule KAM_HOODIA contain merely the number 920+ found in subject and body be a hit. According to the rule, one point for header, one for body and if two or more found, it hits. I had a reservation department not r

KAM.cf ham

2007-05-01 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
Someone just had some ham get hit by KAM.cf. Why would the rule KAM_HOODIA contain merely the number 920+ found in subject and body be a hit. According to the rule, one point for header, one for body and if two or more found, it hits. I had a reservation department not receive a confirmation notice