Le 16/08/2010 15:53, Bowie Bailey a écrit :
On 8/14/2010 5:51 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 12/08/2010 00:37, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simp
On 8/14/2010 5:51 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 12/08/2010 00:37, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
>> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>> In case anyone else is following this...
>>>
>>> The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
>>> renaming the file after updat
Le 12/08/2010 00:37, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track
On 8/11/2010 7:15 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> In case anyone else is following this...
>>
>> The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
>> renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then
>> sa-update loses track of the f
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track of
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, RW wrote:
1) Rename the .cf file back to the original name so sa-update can
find it
2) Run sa-update
3) Rename the .cf file to z_sought_rules_yerp_org.cf
4) Restart spamd
Would it not be simpler just to do something like this
grep -E "^score"
/var/db/spamassassin/*/sough
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track of the file and will download a new copy on every run.
What I
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> In case anyone else is following this...
>
> The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
> renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
> loses track of the file and will download a new copy on
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > > The current situation is: automatic rule updates are only generated
> > > when the corpa of recent messages used in the nightly masscheck is
> > > sufficiently large (150k+ of both spam an
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> >> Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
> >> updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure
> >> I
On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
>> updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure I
>> am running the rules from the dedicated channel and not the updates
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure I am
running the rules from the dedicated channel and not the updates channel
so I have the latest.
The current situat
rules, and I noticed that the
>>>> JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
>>>> 3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
>>> Yes, an explicit request by Justin to zero them out, specifically aiming
>>> at the
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:57 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
> > > JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules
On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
>> JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
>> 3.3.1, but the
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
> JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
> 3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
Yes, an explicit r
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
The rules from the sought channel have scores, but they are being
overridden by the main
17 matches
Mail list logo
