On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:41:00 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue 12 Jan 2010 07:48:23 AM CET, Christian Brel wrote
>
> > http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>
> X-Virus-Status: Infected (Sanesecurity.Junk.25057.UNOFFICIAL)
>
Err, yes - I had already *highlighted* that, it was posted because the
co
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > > I'm just interested in the kind of java-script(?) munging that has
> > > gone on there and what it is in 'English' for want of a better
> > > phrase.
> > Nothing was munged, it's just random text.
> If so, what's the point to it?
By no means
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> By no means a JS coder, and haven't dug deeper to find out, but couldn't
> it be pre-compiled JS and not just random text?
>
Doubtful. I don't believe JavaScript has a bytecode or any other (except
in some JavaScript engines internal representation) compiled format.
Franc
On Tue 12 Jan 2010 07:48:23 AM CET, Christian Brel wrote
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
X-Virus-Status: Infected (Sanesecurity.Junk.25057.UNOFFICIAL)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I'm just interested in the kind of java-script(?) munging that has
gone on there and what it is in 'English' for want of a better
phrase.
Nothing was munged, it's just random text.
If so, what's the point to it?
By no means a JS coder, and haven't dug deeper to find out, but couldn't
it be p
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> Christian Brel wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>
> Anyone seen script like that?
>>>
>>> I'm jus
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:56:09 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> > Christian Brel wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>
> >
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
Anyone seen script like that?
I'm just interested in the kind of java-script(?) munging that
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:15:41 +0100
Per Jessen wrote:
> Christian Brel wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
> >> > http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
> >> >
> >> > Anyone seen script like that?
> >>
> >> IT's the k
Christian Brel wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
>> > http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>> >
>> > Anyone seen script like that?
>>
>> IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
>> clamav does hav
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:44 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
> > http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
> >
> > Anyone seen script like that?
>
> IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
> clamav does have some kind og javascript decopdi
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
>> http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>>
>> Anyone seen script like that?
>
> IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
It's plain spam - personally I don't want clamav to deal with spam.
> clamav does h
On 12.01.10 06:48, Christian Brel wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>
> Anyone seen script like that?
IT's the kind of content that should be captured by clamav imho.
clamav does have some kind og javascript decopding engine.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantoma
Christian Brel wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
>
> Anyone seen script like that?
Yeah, I saw a couple of those last week.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
14 matches
Mail list logo
