Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> Are you sure these messages are being scanned? Take a look at the
>> headers and see if there are X-Spam headers in both the marked and
>> unmarked messages. If so, post those headers here so we can see what
>> is hitting.
>>
> As I inidca
Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> Are you sure these messages are being scanned? Take a look at the
> headers and see if there are X-Spam headers in both the marked and
> unmarked messages. If so, post those headers here so we can see what
> is hitting.
>
As I inidcated in the original mail... th
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Recently several IMG spams and plain-text stock spams have been
> making it in unmarked. However, they'll be right beside two more
> correctly identified. What seems to be happening is that spamd isn't
> always firing all the rules that apply to the message, res
Recently several IMG spams and plain-text stock spams have been making
it in unmarked. However, they'll be right beside two more correctly
identified. What seems to be happening is that spamd isn't always firing all
the rules that apply to the message, resulting in a score 8 or 9 spam
