Le 17/09/2010 00:34, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
[snip]
I had in amavis-conf:
$final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
$final_banned_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
should be much better like this:
$final_spam_destiny = D_REJECT;
$final_banned_destiny = D_REJECT;
It was default with D_BOUN
On tor 16 sep 2010 23:19:34 CEST, franc wrote
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
rejected please, eg dont accept and bouce
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-t
The next thing i just discovered is:
$final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS;
with this rule, each Subject, containing 8-Bit, is sent to the quarantine
folder.
I didn't know this and now i am discovering many emails in the quarantine
which were no spam at all :-)
I commented it out:
# $final_bad_h
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:10 -0700, franc wrote:
> > I seriously hope you just mis-worded that. Bounce!? That would be after
> > *accepting* a message, and with spam generally will be bounced to a
> > forged, innocent bystander -- not the spammer. So please, tell me you
> > actually meant to say REJ
> I seriously hope you just mis-worded that. Bounce!? That would be after
> *accepting* a message, and with spam generally will be bounced to a
> forged, innocent bystander -- not the spammer. So please, tell me you
> actually meant to say REJECT. That is, not accept by the MX.
No, i didn't know
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:19 -0700, franc wrote:
> OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
> 15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
> is bounced.
>
> I think after a while i will know if i can put 2,5,6.31,10 or something like
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
I think after a while i will know if i can put 2,5,6.31,10 or something like
this.
Thank you for the hints!
--
View this message in
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 11:32 -0700, franc wrote:
> > ... Do you train *both*, spam *and* ham? Any chance these
> > have been trained incorrectly before? What Bayes score do they actually
> > get? The X-Spam-Status header would be sufficient to see.
> >
> > The few lines of 'sa-learn --dump magic' w
> ... Do you train *both*, spam *and* ham? Any chance these
> have been trained incorrectly before? What Bayes score do they actually
> get? The X-Spam-Status header would be sufficient to see.
>
> The few lines of 'sa-learn --dump magic' would be good, too. Oh, and you
> are training Bayes as th
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 03:26 -0700, Franc Walter(?) wrote:
> > SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
> > all the available SA plugins.
>
> I trained SA since months with all those chronometer-zeitmesser-spam and
> only 5% is now set to spam.
> I want to get rid
10 matches
Mail list logo
