Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hallo Karsten, Am 2008-10-08 16:23:15, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > Suffering from a backscatter wave, and haven't even got sufficient > caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic > Language Character Set". Yeah, right... You have gotten tonns of "MAILER-DAEMON" messa

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread mouss
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Can this off-topic thread please die already? It has been quite for days. I prefer it like that. +1 guenther Suffering from a backscatter wave, same here, started yesterday. and haven't even got sufficient caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an u

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Can this off-topic thread please die already? It has been quite for days. I prefer it like that. guenther Suffering from a backscatter wave, and haven't even got sufficient caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic Language Character Set". Yeah, right... -- char

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, October 8, 2008 02:25, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-10-07 11:35:31, schrieb Don Saklad: > Why wast resources for funny 2500x1900 screens? here i have 1600x1200 in a frammebuffer, why do i need to install x11 ? > Servers doing non-releated stuff are bad for our Environement, consumin

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-10-07 11:35:31, schrieb Don Saklad: > Someday, in the future when we have real computers users would have > things the way they prefer. Do you relay think, Servers would change? Why wast resources for funny 2500x1900 screens? Servers doing non-releated stuff are bad for our Environement,

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-07 Thread Don Saklad
Someday, in the future when we have real computers users would have things the way they prefer. On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-10-01 08:05:11, schrieb Don Saklad: >> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that >> doesn't have a bracketed li

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-07 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-10-01 08:05:11, schrieb Don Saklad: > Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that > doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject. > > Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers! I am currently on 117 Mailinglists and only ,

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 08:05 -0400, Don Saklad wrote: > Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that > doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject. Please, not again. This topic has been discussed to death before. Try using a search-engine. Starting this y

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread mouss
Matt Kettler wrote: Don Saklad wrote: Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject. Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers! This shouldn't be a programing solution. It's the RFC stand

RE: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Bowie Bailey
Don Saklad wrote: > What do the jargon terms mean?... in MTA = Mail Transfer Agent (aka mail server) MUA = Mail User Agent (aka Outlook, Thunderbird, etc) -- Bowie

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Don Saklad
What do the jargon terms mean?... in On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:05:11 Don Saklad wrote: >> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that >> doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in t

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Matt Kettler
Don Saklad wrote: > Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that > doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject. > > Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers! > > This shouldn't be a programing solution. It's the RFC standardized way to

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:05:11 Don Saklad wrote: > Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that > doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject. > > Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers! Discussing this further might just lead t

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Don Saklad
Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject. Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers!

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Regarding your Subject, that would be these *existing* identifying headers, as already pointed out: List-Post: List-Id: See RFC 2919 [1]. On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 06:39 -0400, Don Saklad wrote: > I'm looking for a workaround, a kludge so that for my subscrip

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread Don Saklad
Thank you! I'm looking for a workaround, a kludge so that for my subscription to users@spamassassin.apache.org the header line of messages would appear for example something like Subject: [usersspamassassin] identifying headers with the bracketed name of the list inserted into every list message

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-01 Thread mouss
Don Saklad wrote: It would be better to have the header something like Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. It is more efficient to use better mail software. This has already been discussed here and on other lists (search the archives). See also: http://www.w3.org/Mail/subject-tagging http://too

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-09-30 Thread Don Saklad
It would be better to have the header something like Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-09-30 Thread mouss
Don Saklad wrote: How do you setup things so that all messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org include identifying headers that begin something like Subject: [usersspamassassin] don't play with the subject. the subject is set by the sender for the recipient to see what the message is abou

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-09-30 Thread Matthias Leisi
Don Saklad schrieb: > How do you setup things so that > all messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org > include identifying headers that begin something like > Subject: [usersspamassassin] I use the List-Id: header in order to sort messages into a separate folder: List-Id: -- Matthias

Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-09-30 Thread Don Saklad
How do you setup things so that all messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org include identifying headers that begin something like Subject: [usersspamassassin] .