Firstly: Hi, First posting to the list.
Secondly:
> It seems to work well but isn't based on much more than a whim and a
little observation. I get very few ham hits on _my_ mail with it, but >
I mainly get pretty clean looking ham.
This seems like a sensible approach in general. However, it s
Tom McClure wrote:
Without ditching the current scoring altogether in favor of a multiplicative
model (a la bayes), what if there were a post-analysis scoring step that just
took into account the total number of positive rules (or rule families, if
there is such a division)? Instead of looking
I run a small ISP and have installed SpamAssassin to stop spam. It catches a
lot of spam. It's especially good at filtering out the worst, most offensive
mail, but a good deal of spam still gets through the filter, even after a
user's bayes db gets big enough to start adding the bayes tests.
