John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
> I don't see anything obviously wrong with the root From == To meta
> subrules:
> > header __TO_EQ_FROM_1 ALL =~ >
/\nFrom:[^\n<]{0,80}]+)>?\n(?:[^\n]{1,100}\n)*To:[^\n]+\1/ism
> header __TO_EQ_FROM_2 A
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
> > On 4/28/10 3:13 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > >0.0 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY To == From and HTML only
> > >0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX To == From and direct-to-MX
> > >1.7 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT To == From and HTML only, dire
John Hardin wrote:
On 4/28/10 3:13 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> 0.0 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY To == From and HTML only
> 0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX To == From and direct-to-MX
> 1.7 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT To == From and HTML only, direct-to-MX
There was a bug in handling bare addresses in the f
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/28/10 3:13 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> 0.0 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY To == From and HTML only
> 0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX To == From and direct-to-MX
> 1.7 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT To == From and HTML only, direct-to-MX
so.
On 4/28/10 4:47 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/28/10 3:13 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
0.0 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY To == From and HTML only
0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX To == From and direct-to-MX
1.7 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT To == From and HTML only, direct-to-MX
so. its als
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 4/28/10 3:13 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
0.0 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY To == From and HTML only
0.0 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX To == From and direct-to-MX
1.7 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT To == From and HTML only, direct-to-MX
so. its also obviously bulk email.
I don't know how
