Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2022-01-20 23:35, Bill Cole wrote: (and probably should) add that machine to your internal_networks setting, since an RFC1918 address is pretty much the definition of internal. another pmc member say to me all rfc1918 is hardcoded in spamassassin sure if its still missing ?

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> On 2022-01-20 at 16:21:40 UTC-0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:21:40 -0500) > Joe Acquisto-j4 > is rumored to have said: > . . . . . > To figure out what matched, you'll need to check a message with the > "rules" debug channel on: > > spamassassin -t -D rules < suspect.eml > > HOWEVER: In looki

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>> On 2022-01-20 15:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) >> >> old version >> >>> * 1.8 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available >> >> have you configured internal_networks, trusted_networks ? > > Yes, keeping up to date is not my stro

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Jeff Mincy
Greg Troxel writes: > From: Greg Troxel > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:32:53 -0500 > > I followed my own advice about egrep -R and found this immediately > > it's in > > 3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf > > and it is > > ##{ FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 > header FSL_HELO_NON_F

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-01-20 at 16:21:40 UTC-0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:21:40 -0500) Joe Acquisto-j4 is rumored to have said: Am 20.01.22 um 15:47 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4: Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM. Star

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>>> > On 2022-01-20 15:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) > > old version > >> * 1.8 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available > > have you configured internal_networks, trusted_networks ? Yes, keeping up to date is not my strong suit.

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> I followed my own advice about egrep -R and found this immediately > > it's in > > 3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf > > and it is > > ##{ FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 > header FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^\]]+ > helo=[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+ /i > ##} FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2022-01-20 15:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) old version * 1.8 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available have you configured internal_networks, trusted_networks ?

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Greg Troxel
I followed my own advice about egrep -R and found this immediately it's in 3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf and it is ##{ FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 header FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^\]]+ helo=[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+ /i ##} FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 with score score FSL_

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> > Am 20.01.22 um 15:47 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4: >> Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I > noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM. >> >> Started seeing it sometime after making some configuration changes to local > settings on postfix, attem

Re: Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Greg Troxel
"Joe Acquisto-j4" writes: > Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I > noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM. > > Started seeing it sometime after making some configuration changes to local > settings on postfix, attempting to isolate a "bug"

Hits on item with " No description available"

2022-01-20 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM. Started seeing it sometime after making some configuration changes to local settings on postfix, attempting to isolate a "bug". But before reverting them all, or