>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:56 AM
>To: SPAMASSASSIN
>Subject: Help analyzing the determination of spam
>
>
>Nice subject!
>
>I attached a message to this email that got an incredibl
Thanks all,
That does help quite a bit. We'll see how the weekend goes!
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:24 PM
> To: Jason Gauthier; SPAMASSASSIN
> Subject: Help analyzing the determina
At 10:55 AM 1/21/2005, Jason Gauthier wrote:
Nice subject!
I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam
score.
When I run the message through spamassassin -t it gets a spam score as I
would expect.
I know I don't have much more details, but can anyone give me ideas why?
Conte
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam
> score. When I run the message through spamassassin -t it gets a
> spam score as I would expect.
>
> I know I don't have much more details, but can anyone give me ideas
> why?
>
Nice subject!
I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam
score.
When I run the message through spamassassin -t it gets a spam score as I
would expect.
I know I don't have much more details, but can anyone give me ideas why?
Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 5.0 r
