Re: Header exposes account name

2012-09-03 Thread drew....@gmail.com
It does appear to be the (exim?) filtering that is adding the foobar account name. Receiving an email always adds Received and X-Identified-User fields plus account name. While sending and replying always delivers X-Identified-User plus account name. Thanks for all the help. Will redirect foc

Re: Header exposes account name

2012-09-02 Thread RW
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:48:15 -0400 drew@gmail.com wrote: > Gentlemen, > > Thanks for replying so quickly. I'm quite the newbee in this area and > am grateful for your advise. While the new header entries were first > noticed after enabling SA, it was not obvious that Exim could be > another

Re: Header exposes account name

2012-09-02 Thread drew....@gmail.com
Gentlemen, Thanks for replying so quickly. I'm quite the newbee in this area and am grateful for your advise. While the new header entries were first noticed after enabling SA, it was not obvious that Exim could be another suspect. I will investigate whether it can configured to interpose or

Re: Header exposes account name

2012-09-02 Thread wolfgang
On 2012-09-02 23:14, Dave Funk wrote: > Not sure where that 'X-Identified-User' header comes from, maybe > it's an Exim thing. It's not a SA header. All headers that SA adds > start with 'X-Spam-' (eg: X-Spam-Report: or X-Spam-Status: ). > > It could be that the "glue" you're using to connect SA

Re: Header exposes account name

2012-09-02 Thread Dave Funk
Why are you blaming SpamAssasin for those headers? The 'Received:' header is a standard "trace" header that your MTA is supposed to add to each message that it processes (see RFC-2822). Note the end of the header you quoted, it even has Exim's name in it. Not sure where that 'X-Identified-User

Header exposes account name

2012-09-02 Thread drew....@gmail.com
Hello, I've poked around the archives and faq and cannot find a solution for my case. Our Church has a website hosted by a popular service and recently we setup email accounts plus SpamAssassin. It is all working nicely except for one alarming thing I found in spamassassin generated headers.