It is only passing once.On 4/27/06, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it going through the SpamAssassin tests exactly once or is there achance it goes through twice?{^_^}- Original Message -From: "Paul Dulaba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Ok, I changed the tagging slightly, and I can confirm that i
Is it going through the SpamAssassin tests exactly once or is there a
chance it goes through twice?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Dulaba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, I changed the tagging slightly, and I can confirm that it is still
happening and that the tagging is on my end:
==
Ok, I changed the tagging slightly, and I can confirm that it is still happening and that the tagging is on my end:===From: "Court of Appeal Distribution" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: ***SPAM*** Court
Try changing your subject tag slightly and see if the tag in the mail
changes. If not (and you remembered to restart spamd) then someone else is
tagging it.
Loren
Paul Dulaba wrote:
> As far as I know, SpamAssassin does.
Ahh.. Yes it does.. Nevermind..
That said, the presence of that header doesn't really mean much. SA only adds
that when it tags. If another SA instance did the tagging, your site would not
have modified X-Spam-Prev-Subject.
However, the d
As far as I know, SpamAssassin does.On 4/20/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Dulaba wrote:> I am contacting the originator, as they are basically another> department, to see if they are running anything. I doubt they are> though, they currently use tags of [SPAM-high].
>> The other
Paul Dulaba wrote:
> I am contacting the originator, as they are basically another
> department, to see if they are running anything. I doubt they are
> though, they currently use tags of [SPAM-high].
>
> The other thing that makes it look like my system is the
> X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Court of App
I am contacting the originator, as they are basically another department, to see if they are running anything. I doubt they are though, they currently use tags of [SPAM-high].The other thing that makes it look like my system is the
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Court of Appeal Judgments to be filedThe mes
Paul Dulaba wrote:
> Just upgraded to SA 3.1 from 3.04. Running on SLES 9. I have a couple
> examples of a message that SA scores as Ham, but that still got the
> Subject line re-written:
Any chance it got scanned by two different copies of SA? Including the sending
side?
If a second SA scans a
Just upgraded to SA 3.1 from 3.04. Running on SLES 9. I have a couple examples of a message that SA scores as Ham, but that still got the Subject line re-written:==
From: "Court of Appeal Distribution" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PR
10 matches
Mail list logo
