On Sunday, September 5, 2004, 2:56:04 PM, Ryan Thompson wrote:
> FWIW, the mass-check I did on that 75K corpus took about 1.75h, on a
> beefy machine with rbldnsd running on localhost, with 20 concurrent
> jobs. (mass-check is slower than molasses for anything that blocks if
> you don't let it run
Jeff Chan wrote to SURBL Discuss and SpamAssassin Users:
In order to reduce false positives in the SURBL data, we would
like to have access to ham corpora. Does anyone know of any
public ham copora, including just the URI domain names from the
hams? Or is there anyone who would be willing to run
In order to reduce false positives in the SURBL data, we would
like to have access to ham corpora. Does anyone know of any
public ham copora, including just the URI domain names from the
hams? Or is there anyone who would be willing to run our URI
domain lists against their ham?
Does anyone know
