On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:48 +0200, Axb wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 12:46 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:05 +0200, Axb wrote:
> >> have you looked at the URIDetail plugin ?
> >>
> > I didn't know it existed until now, but it looks useful. It looks as if
> > it can easily solve th
Great, thanks, will do that today.
Alex, from osmose.
Bow before me, for I am root.
On 12-09-27 07:04 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 09/27, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
>> I met you earlier on the IRC channel, remember?
> Yup.
>
>> Anyway, I would be glad to submit my rules (corrected by Bowie
On 09/27, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
> I met you earlier on the IRC channel, remember?
Yup.
> Anyway, I would be glad to submit my rules (corrected by Bowie Bailey).
> I indeed asked how one could do that.
Open a bug: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
Include the rule(s) and request that the
Hi there Darxus !
I met you earlier on the IRC channel, remember?
Anyway, I would be glad to submit my rules (corrected by Bowie Bailey).
I indeed asked how one could do that.
Should I start a sandbox? I'm familiar with some aspects of SA, but the
"return to the project" lack to my personnal cul
On 09/25, John Hardin wrote:
> This topic comes up regularly enough that it should be a FAQ.
Yeah. I haven't read this thread enough to know if it's been said, but
here's a previous thread on the subject:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/antiphishing-td52027i20.html
And the existing ru
Alex, from Nexus7.
Boyaah!
Le 27 sept. 2012 14:34, "Bowie Bailey" a écrit :
>
>
> On 9/27/2012 1:48 PM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
>>
>> Alex, from prypiat.
>> Yes, I recycle.
>>
>>
>> On 12-09-27 11:09 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/27/2012 10:41 AM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
Hello all,
On 9/27/2012 1:48 PM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
Alex, from prypiat.
Yes, I recycle.
On 12-09-27 11:09 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 9/27/2012 10:41 AM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
Hello all,
Here is a small ruleset that I'm working with. I added it to our
local ruleset in prod:
# BAD LINKS N-NG
Alex, from prypiat.
Yes, I recycle.
On 12-09-27 11:09 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 9/27/2012 10:41 AM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Here is a small ruleset that I'm working with. I added it to our
>> local ruleset in prod:
>>
>> # BAD LINKS N-NG ;-) ;
>> # Canada Post
>>
On 9/27/2012 10:41 AM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
Hello all,
Here is a small ruleset that I'm working with. I added it to our local
ruleset in prod:
# BAD LINKS N-NG ;-) ;
# Canada Post
Hello all,
Here is a small ruleset that I'm working with. I added it to our local
ruleset in prod:
# BAD LINKS N-NG
;-)
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 17:42 +0200, Axb wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 05:38 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > then realised that SA makes no guarantees about the order in which rules
> > are executed other than metarules being executed after all the
> > (sub)rules they reference. Obviously this prevents th
On 09/26/2012 05:38 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
then realised that SA makes no guarantees about the order in which rules
are executed other than metarules being executed after all the
(sub)rules they reference. Obviously this prevents the use of variables
in rules.
you could try and play with p
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 07:42 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > apart from the problem of matching the two halves if/when there is more
> > than one URL in a message.
>
> I'm not following what you mean here, could you explain that in a bit more
> detai
Alex, from prypiat.
Yes, I recycle.
On 12-09-26 11:03 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 9/26/2012 10:45 AM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Me happy :-D
>>
>> It works as expected for simple rules.
>>
>> For example, to get rid off my problem with youtube links I had this
>> simple rule:
>>
>
On 9/26/2012 10:45 AM, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
Hi all,
Me happy :-D
It works as expected for simple rules.
For example, to get rid off my problem with youtube links I had this
simple rule:
uri_detail Z_URIDETAIL_UTUBE_SPOOF raw !~ /youtube\./ text =~
/(https?://)?(www\.)?youtube\
Hi all,
Me happy :-D
It works as expected for simple rules.
For example, to get rid off my problem with youtube links I had this
simple rule:
uri_detail Z_URIDETAIL_UTUBE_SPOOF raw !~ /youtube\./ text =~
/(https?://)?(www\.)?youtube\./ type =~ /^a$/
scoreZ_URIDETAIL_UTUB
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 22:12 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
I'm thinking something like this, using what you presented as an example:
Generated internal pseudo-header:
X-Spam-URL:
http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VvOF
I found a couple of examples with uri_detail checks (instead of uri
checks) that are written in a very similar way to what John suggested.
I wil test this today.
Having writen two plugins already (that is, on the edge to begin to
understand how the PMS works ;) ), I knew that one could work with
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:48 +0200, Axb wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 12:46 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:05 +0200, Axb wrote:
> >> have you looked at the URIDetail plugin ?
> >>
> > I didn't know it existed until now, but it looks useful. It looks as if
> > it can easily solve th
On 09/26/2012 12:46 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:05 +0200, Axb wrote:
have you looked at the URIDetail plugin ?
I didn't know it existed until now, but it looks useful. It looks as if
it can easily solve the OP's problem too.
Martin
If you could create a couple of (w
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:05 +0200, Axb wrote:
> have you looked at the URIDetail plugin ?
>
I didn't know it existed until now, but it looks useful. It looks as if
it can easily solve the OP's problem too.
Martin
On 09/26/2012 12:02 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 22:12 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
I'm thinking something like this, using what you presented as an example:
Generated internal pseudo-header:
X-Spam-URL:
http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 22:12 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> I'm thinking something like this, using what you presented as an example:
>
> Generated internal pseudo-header:
> X-Spam-URL:
> http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VvOFqaHbL5&feature=g-vrec&feature=g-vrec
>
Please keep the discussion on-list so others may benefit or make
suggestions, thanks.
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
I totaly agree. I think that the HTML parser could easily handle this.
To the best of my knowledge, there is no modifier (like :addr or :name
for From header ch
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
It's essentially FREEMAIL_FROM and the body only contains a fake Youtube
link like:
http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf";>http://www.youtube.com/wa=
tch?v=3D3VvOFqaHbL5&feature=3Dg-vrec&feature=3Dg-vrec
This topic comes up regularly enough that it
Hi list,
I'm receiving a lot of spam of a very particular sort.
It's essentially FREEMAIL_FROM and the body only contains a fake Youtube
link like:
http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf";>http://www.youtube.com/wa=
tch?v=3D3VvOFqaHbL5&feature=3Dg-vrec&feature=3Dg-vrec
I ended with a regex fo
26 matches
Mail list logo
