Re: Google feedproxy redirector abuse

2009-11-20 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Monday, November 16, 2009 10:27 AM -0800 John Hardin wrote: meta MANY_GOOG_PROXY __FEEDPROXY > 5 Got one with exactly 5 today. Looks like they're learning. Dammit. I should have sent that to you offlist. :( -- John Hardi

Re: Google feedproxy redirector abuse

2009-11-20 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Monday, November 16, 2009 10:27 AM -0800 John Hardin wrote: meta MANY_GOOG_PROXY __FEEDPROXY > 5 Got one with exactly 5 today. Looks like they're learning.

Re: Google feedproxy redirector abuse

2009-11-16 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Kenneth Porter wrote: I've been seeing pill spam with lots of identical URIs pointing at feedproxy.google.com over the last week or two. All the URI's seem to be this (leading http slash slash removed): feedproxy.google.com/~r/CraigslistHoustonAllForSale/WantedSearchquoth

Google feedproxy redirector abuse

2009-11-16 Thread Kenneth Porter
I've been seeing pill spam with lots of identical URIs pointing at feedproxy.google.com over the last week or two. All the URI's seem to be this (leading http slash slash removed): feedproxy.google.com/~r/CraigslistHoustonAllForSale/WantedSearchquothealthquot/~3/3yX2enlGlyE/ I've no idea where