From: "David B Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Michael Grey wrote:
In regards to the second, many large companies have outside companies do work
for them in the areas of marketing and other aspects. So this also will
happen regardless.
Let me clarify; this is an OUTSIDE relay to
mber 08, 2006 09:40
Subject: Fuzzy OCR false positives from Screenshots...
We are testing a new configuration using FuzzyOCR, and found it to work very
well overall...
However, there have been two occasions in the last 24 hrs where screenshots
embedded into the emails caused false positive
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Michael Grey wrote:
> In regards to the second, many large companies have outside companies do work
> for them in the areas of marketing and other aspects. So this also will
> happen regardless.
>
> Let me clarify; this is an OUTSIDE relay to INSIDE...
>
> A FuzzyOCR White List
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Michael Grey wrote:
We are testing a new configuration using FuzzyOCR, and found it to work very
well overall...
However, there have been two occasions in the last 24 hrs where screenshots
embedded into the emails caused false positives.
One was an 'account summary' from a c
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Randal, Phil wrote:
Score appropriately, train your Bayes well, and the false positives
should diminish.
FUZZY_OCR gives crazily high scores to certain things.
One point per matched keyword, I believe. I've seen FUZZY_OCR,
by itself, give scores as high as 24.00.
Here's th
t; To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Fuzzy OCR false positives from Screenshots...
>
>
> You will have to ask the cell company about the first issue ...
>
> In regards to the second, many large companies have outside
> companies do work
> for them in the areas of
FuzzyOCR White List with (very privately held) keywords would help.
Any other ideas ?
Michael Grey
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:10 AM
To: Michael Grey
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fuzzy OCR false
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Michael Grey wrote:
> However, there have been two occasions in the last 24 hrs where screenshots
> embedded into the emails caused false positives.
>
> One was an 'account summary' from a cell company, the other was some internal
> marketing info.
>
> Are there other approac
We are testing a new configuration using FuzzyOCR, and found
it to work very well overall…
However, there have been two occasions in the last 24 hrs
where screenshots embedded into the emails caused false positives.
One was an ‘account summary’ from a cell
company, the other was so
