I would be willing to maintain an RBL type list of freemail domains if
this would be useful. I could set up a VPS for the front end and provide
several servers and lots of bandwidth for a backend.
On 1/28/2009 10:15 PM, Alan Munday wrote:
Henrik K wrote the following on 28/01/09 18:54:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35:44AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Henrik K wrote:
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
I notice the list of freemail providers has changed - how frequently
Henrik K wrote the following on 28/01/09 18:54:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35:44AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Henrik K wrote:
>>
>>> http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
>> I notice the list of freemail providers has changed - how frequently
>&g
On 1/28/2009 7:54 PM, Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35:44AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Henrik K wrote:
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
I notice the list of freemail providers has changed - how frequently
should we be updating this plugin? Is there an sa-update
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35:44AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Henrik K wrote:
>
>> http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
>
> I notice the list of freemail providers has changed - how frequently
> should we be updating this plugin? Is there an sa-update cha
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Henrik K wrote:
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
I notice the list of freemail providers has changed - how frequently
should we be updating this plugin? Is there an sa-update channel for it?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:01:07AM -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> I've been using the FreeMail.pm plugin to good effect, but I would like
> to expand it slightly.
>
> Currently it fires if the From: header contains a freemail address, or
> if the From: and Reply-to: heade
On Tue, January 27, 2009 15:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> What's the problem deriving that rule from the existing rules?
FREEMAIL_REPLYTO can only hit if FREEMAIL_FROM hit, so one cant make
meta for the reply-to
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
Dan McDonald wrote on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:31:07 -0600:
> Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and the
> reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail address. I
> want a rule to fire for FREEMAIL_REPLYTO even if the From: header does
> not contain a freema
On Tue, January 27, 2009 13:31, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and
> the reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail
> address.
add # before return in line 553 should be it as i read it, then it
olso check reply-to even if f
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:34 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> > I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail
> > list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth
> > much (maybe .5) but I think it will get eno
On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail
> list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth
> much (maybe .5) but I think it will get enough to push some of
> these advance-fee scams over the top.
>
>
I've been using the FreeMail.pm plugin to good effect, but I would like
to expand it slightly.
Currently it fires if the From: header contains a freemail address, or
if the From: and Reply-to: headers contain different freemail addresses.
I would like to add a test that scores a From: not i
13 matches
Mail list logo
