On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:22:55 +
David Jones wrote:
> 2. Seems like there should be easy rules to detect more than one pair
> of angle brackets and more than on at sign to add points to
> non-standard display names.
The reason I asked about the precise form is that it's not simply
a bracketed
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 11/17/18 9:52 AM, John Hardin wrote:
From: John D. Smith
To: kdeu...@vianet.ca
Message-ID: <35706717752563516902.8f4660866aa84...@vianet.ca>
Couple of things:
1. Recent discussions on this mailing list showed me that the Message-ID
should never have
On 11/17/18 9:52 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>> From: John D. Smith
>> To: kdeu...@vianet.ca
>> Message-ID: <35706717752563516902.8f4660866aa84...@vianet.ca>
>>
>> Couple of things:
>> 1. Recent discussions on this mailing list showed me that the Message-ID
>> should never have the recipient's domain
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 11/16/18 7:44 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even though
SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this forwarded email
for instances
Original message From: User
On 11/16/18 7:44 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even though
> SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this forwarded email
> for instances
>
>> Original message From: User Date:
>> 11/15/18 10:42 AM (G
On 16.11.18 08:44, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even
though SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this forwarded
email for instances
does the mail pass or fail SPF and DKIM?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:39:47 -0500
Kris Deugau wrote:
> From: John D. Smith
> ...
> Looking at a couple of other examples, there are also some in the
> form:
>
> From: =?UTF-8?B?[encoded stuff]=
>
> where [encoded stuff] decodes to:
>
> Some User
I think this is worth a try:
header FROM
Dominic Raferd wrote on 11/16/2018 8:50 AM>
Please clarify what you mean by 'even though SPF and DKIM is setup
with DMARC to reject'? I presume that 'company.com' does not have a
DMARC p=reject policy, or else your DMARC program (e.g. opendmarc)
should block forged emails from them.
Oh yes, so
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 15:54, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Dominic Raferd wrote on 11/16/2018 8:50 AM>
> > Please clarify what you mean by 'even though SPF and DKIM is setup
> > with DMARC to reject'? I presume that 'company.com' does not have a
> > DMARC p=reject policy, or else your DMARC progr
RW wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:44:52 -0500
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even
though SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this
forwarded email for instances
[ fake invoice email ]
SPF and DKIM rarely return "fail" on
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:44:52 -0500
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even
> though SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this
> forwarded email for instances
This is a pretty confusing question because it has nothing to do with
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 13:45, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even though
> SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this forwarded email
> for instances
>
> > Original message
> > From: User
> > Date: 11/15/
We're having an issue with spam coming from the same company even though
SPF and DKIM is setup with DMARC to reject. Take this forwarded email
for instances
Original message
From: User
Date: 11/15/18 10:42 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Other User
Subject: OVERDUE INVOICE
Sorr
13 matches
Mail list logo
