Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>>Yes, bayes poison should be trained without worry. However, bayes poison is
>>not
>>the topic of discussion here. We are talking about mis-learning, something
>>COMPLETELY different.
>
>
> Kai Schaetzl talked about "prevent[ing] you from accident
Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> Yes, bayes poison should be trained without worry. However, bayes poison is
> not
> the topic of discussion here. We are talking about mis-learning, something
> COMPLETELY different.
Kai Schaetzl talked about "prevent[ing] you from accidently poisoning
your Bayes db", so
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
DISCLAIMER: I *really* think it's a bad idea to adjust this. But if you
insist,
it is possible.
I want there to still be some difficulty to intimidate you from changing
this
without some consideration. (it shouldn't be hard to find the se
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>>Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>>Magnus Holmgren wrote on Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:06:20 +0200:
>>>
In other words, is there a way to bypass the 3 points minimum for header
and body? (Why isn't that limit configurable, by the way?)
>>>
>>>It's trying to preve
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
>>Magnus Holmgren wrote on Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:06:20 +0200:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In other words, is there a way to bypass the 3 points minimum for header
>>>and body? (Why isn't that limit configurable, by the way?)
>>
>>
>>It's trying to prevent you from acc
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote on Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:06:20 +0200:
>
>
>>In other words, is there a way to bypass the 3 points minimum for header
>>and body? (Why isn't that limit configurable, by the way?)
>
>
> It's trying to prevent you from accidently poisoning your Bayes db.
Hello Magnus,
Thursday, July 28, 2005, 12:06:20 AM, you wrote:
MH> Is there a way to say to SA that "if this custom rule of mine triggers,
MH> then the mail *is* spam and you have to autolearn it as such.", except
MH> looking for MY_CUSTOM_RULE in X-Spam-Status afterwards and feeding the
MH> mail
Magnus Holmgren wrote on Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:06:20 +0200:
> In other words, is there a way to bypass the 3 points minimum for header
> and body? (Why isn't that limit configurable, by the way?)
It's trying to prevent you from accidently poisoning your Bayes db.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Ger
Is there a way to say to SA that "if this custom rule of mine triggers,
then the mail *is* spam and you have to autolearn it as such.", except
looking for MY_CUSTOM_RULE in X-Spam-Status afterwards and feeding the
mail to sa-learn if found?
In other words, is there a way to bypass the 3 points min
