That was it. I had for some reason has removed the R flag in the
postfix filter that was sending the mail to spamc.
That of course broke spf's ability to do lookups on Return-Path.
On Aug 16, 2005, at 9:29 AM, Steve Martin wrote:
Running spamd with --debug=spf I'm getting some clues
In th
Running spamd with --debug=spf I'm getting some clues
In the spamd log, I'm seeing...
Aug 16 09:16:37 xx spamassassin[6390]: spf: cannot get Envelope-
From, cannot use SPF
But, after I receive the email and run it through, it has no problem
finding Envelope-From.
Anyone know what may
I still have something strange going on that I can't figure out.
When your mail came this morning, it did NOT have SPF_PASS, but if I
run things manually now, I get it.
Here is what I'm seeing when I run things manually now...
The HELO fails like this...
[5056] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo
Well, that one failed and it wasn't the list-posted copy. That was my direct
email.
And the HELO *should* pass due to the inclusion of IP address.
It looks like you've got a broken trust path and SA is checking the wrong
Received: header.
Is your mailserver NATed?
Do you have trusted_networks
Hi,
on a well-behaved mailing list sends all mails are sent by "Mr. Majordomo" or
such,
and they should work well.
Less well-behaved ones have the list server send mail as the originating user :(
I installed something on a MTA a while ago which would ask senders from a local
domain
to authenti
I replied elsewhere, but I was having some strange DNS problems today
that probably caused every other lookup to fail. I THINK that was
what was causing it. I'll watch for a while...
On Aug 15, 2005, at 8:12 PM, List Mail User wrote:
...
Not for me...
* -6.0 USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO User is
>...
>Not for me...
>
>* -6.0 USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO User is listed in 'whitelist_to' * 2.4
>SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail)
>* [SPF failed: ] * -1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto
>white-list
>
>That is from your message...
>
>On Aug 15, 2005, at 6
Looks like I was having a DNS problem. Not sure why it would turn
into SPF_FAIL's, though since I think it would fail to get the SPF
record and at that point shouldn't it not run SPF rules?
I reran some of the messages that had been failing and they are fine
now.
On Aug 15, 2005, at 6:1
Not for me...
* -6.0 USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO User is listed in 'whitelist_to' * 2.4
SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail)
* [SPF failed: ] * -1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto
white-list
That is from your message...
On Aug 15, 2005, at 6:17 PM, List
ED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: First 3.1 observation
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
>...
>The first thing I've noticed after running 3.1pre1 for a few days is
>that I'm getting much less bayes auto learning of ham due to the fact
>that most of my messages from mailings lists fail SPF tests and get
>penalized 2.4-2.6 points or so for it. They still aren't marked as
>spam,
Steve Martin wrote:
> The first thing I've noticed after running 3.1pre1 for a few days is
> that I'm getting much less bayes auto learning of ham due to the fact
> that most of my messages from mailings lists fail SPF tests and get
> penalized 2.4-2.6 points or so for it. They still aren't mar
The first thing I've noticed after running 3.1pre1 for a few days is
that I'm getting much less bayes auto learning of ham due to the fact
that most of my messages from mailings lists fail SPF tests and get
penalized 2.4-2.6 points or so for it. They still aren't marked as
spam, but with h
13 matches
Mail list logo
