Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-05 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:02:29 +0200 Mark Martinec wrote: Looks like the kind of a thing appropriate to open a problem report in the SpamAssassin's bugzilla. I can do later. Please do open a bug so that we don't lose track of this. Thanks. -- Jo

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-05 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 09:11:13 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > > This appears to be a bit of odd coding in the Bayes DBM module. It's > passing a message to logger with unused arguments. > > I haven't done a deep analysis, but you might try this patch: > > Index: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/D

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-05 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:05:34 +0200 Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Den 01.07.2014 23:05, skrev Herbert J. Skuhra: On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:37:17 +0200 Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Den 25.06.2014 00:42, skrev Bruce Sackett: I apologize, I’m sure it’s been cov

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-05 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:02:29 +0200 Mark Martinec wrote: > On 2014-07-05 14:18, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > Jun 24 13:47:53.167 [3245] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure > > dependency in sprintf while running with -T switch at > > /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2/Mail/SpamAssassin/Log

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-05 Thread Mark Martinec
On 2014-07-05 14:18, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Jun 24 13:47:53.167 [3245] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure dependency in sprintf while running with -T switch at /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2/Mail/SpamAssassin/Logger.pm line 241. Jun 24 13:47:53.168 [3245] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen. That

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-05 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:05:34 +0200 Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > Den 01.07.2014 23:05, skrev Herbert J. Skuhra: > > On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:37:17 +0200 > > Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > >> Den 25.06.2014 00:42, skrev Bruce Sackett: > >> > I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-03 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Den 01.07.2014 23:05, skrev Herbert J. Skuhra: On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:37:17 +0200 Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Den 25.06.2014 00:42, skrev Bruce Sackett: > I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been > successful finding results in searches on the web or through the > history of th

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-01 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:37:17 +0200 Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > Den 25.06.2014 00:42, skrev Bruce Sackett: > > I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been > > successful finding results in searches on the web or through the > > history of the list. I get no BAYES results in the hea

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-07-01 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Den 25.06.2014 00:42, skrev Bruce Sackett: I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been successful finding results in searches on the web or through the history of the list. I get no BAYES results in the headers, so I don’t see any working. The part that gets me is below: Jun 2

SOLVED: Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-06-27 Thread Bruce Sackett
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:42:22 -0700 >>> Bruce Sackett wrote: I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been successful finding results in searches on the web or through the history of the list. I get

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-06-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:42:22 -0700 Bruce Sackett wrote: I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been successful finding results in searches on the web or through the history of the list. I get no BAYES results in the headers, so I don’t see any working. On Jun 25, 2014, at 5:4

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-06-25 Thread RW
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:42:22 -0700 Bruce Sackett wrote: > I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been > successful finding results in searches on the web or through the > history of the list. I get no BAYES results in the headers, so I > don’t see any working. Have you trained i

Re: Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-06-24 Thread Jeremy McSpadden
Try adding -U to your mailscanner banger/# line. -- Jeremy McSpadden Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net | Endless Solutions Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955 On Jun 24, 2014, at 5:42 PM, "Bruce Sackett" mailto:br...@oecnw.com>> wrot

Bayer Filter Not Working

2014-06-24 Thread Bruce Sackett
I apologize, I’m sure it’s been covered, but I have not been successful finding results in searches on the web or through the history of the list. I get no BAYES results in the headers, so I don’t see any working. The part that gets me is below: Jun 24 13:47:53.165 [3245] dbg: bayes: tie-ing

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Matthew van Eerde wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Here is the header of an email that was marked as spam and was moved >>> to the proper folder. (File attached) >> >> I notice the one that worked was not multipart, and the one that >> didn't work was multipart. Is

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread robert
If your asking if this is the pattern, I never noticed it so I dont know. At this point I would assume this is true in general. Thanks Robert > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Here is the header of an email that was marked as spam and was moved >> to the proper folder. (File attached) > > I notice the

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is the header of an email that was marked as spam and was moved > to the proper folder. (File attached) I notice the one that worked was not multipart, and the one that didn't work was multipart. Is this true in general? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread robert
Here is the header of an email that was marked as spam and was moved to the proper folder. (File attached) Thanks Robert > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes/) >> >> Attached is the header from one of the emails with the issue > > Header contains:

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes/) > > Attached is the header from one of the emails with the issue Header contains: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.0 required=3.0 Well, that line matches the regex. Can you post a header from an email that does not h

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread robert
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes/) >> { >> >> to "$VHOME/Maildir/.Spam" >> >> } >> else >> { >> to "$VPOP" >> >> } >> >> Now 9 out of 10 times this works. But an email here and there gets >> tagged as spam but still gets delivered to the mailbox. Any >> sugges

RE: Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes/) > { > > to "$VHOME/Maildir/.Spam" > > } > else > { > to "$VPOP" > > } > > Now 9 out of 10 times this works. But an email here and there gets > tagged as spam but still gets delivered to the mailbox. Any > suggestions? If you

Filter not working

2005-11-23 Thread robert
I sent an email to this list about this issue last week. I was told it was the MA and not SA that is causing the issue. Now the same issue just happened and I need some help. Whats happening is an email is getting tagged as spam and according to the maildrop script Im using if the email is tagged