Re: Feedback on 3.2.4

2008-01-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
Jorge Valdes wrote: No problems with it at all here (around 7 servers upgraded) and the performance is greatly increased. I went from a 1.4 second average scan time to 0.6 seconds average. HTH, Rick Is this without network tests? Because on my server I had Begin : 2008-01-01 End

Re: Feedback on 3.2.4

2008-01-23 Thread Jorge Valdes
Rick Macdougall wrote: Skip wrote: Other than the initial reports of performance boost from 3.2.4, I haven't seen much discussion on it as yet. Perhaps it is still too soon to know, but has anyone been seeing other benefits - or identified potential problems? No problems with it at all her

Re: Feedback on 3.2.4

2008-01-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
Skip wrote: Other than the initial reports of performance boost from 3.2.4, I haven't seen much discussion on it as yet. Perhaps it is still too soon to know, but has anyone been seeing other benefits - or identified potential problems? No problems with it at all here (around 7 servers upgrad

Feedback on 3.2.4

2008-01-23 Thread Skip
Other than the initial reports of performance boost from 3.2.4, I haven't seen much discussion on it as yet. Perhaps it is still too soon to know, but has anyone been seeing other benefits - or identified potential problems? - Skip