On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:41:39 -0500
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2010/03/11 9:10 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:06 -0500
> > Jason Bertoch wrote:
> >
> >
> >> For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
> >> autolearn.
> >
> > No, they can be autolearned. The auto
On 2010/03/11 9:10 AM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:06 -0500
Jason Bertoch wrote:
For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
autolearn.
No, they can be autolearned. The autolearn plugin computes
it's own version of the score that ignores noautolearn rules.
W
rom and bayes_ignore_to configuration options should
> do what you want. There's also the WhiteListSubject plugin in v310.pre
> if you'd prefer, but that can be abused.
>
> For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
> autolearn.
--
View
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:06 -0500
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
> autolearn.
No, they can be autolearned. The autolearn plugin computes
it's own version of the score that ignores noautolearn rules.
On 2010/03/11 6:32 AM, idahank wrote:
I use spamassasin 3.2.4 with amavisd-new 2.5 and sendmail 8.13.1 on Redhat
Enterprise LINUX 4.8
Several of my network's users receive quarantine Emails from other providers
that contain lots of spam-tokens without being spam. As different rules
detect these
assin (or amavis) to exclude mails from a
defined sender or subject from autolearn?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Exclude-Sender-from-Autolearn-tp27862300p27862300.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
