RW writes:
> I wonder why you are learning through spamc at all. IIRC you observered
> that sa-learn was a little slower than in your previous SA version, you
> tried spamc and found it to be slower and more trouble than using
> sa-learn on a directory. sa-learn AFAIK has no limit, so why not go
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:11:49 +0100
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> John Hardin writes:
> > I'd suggest doing a size test and explicitly telling spamc to use
> > the same size limit.
>
> That is the safest. ;-) Only problem could be maintainability.
> The default value of 500 KB is a good one?
It dep
John Hardin writes:
>> How do I found out what the size limit is? And I still need the check,
>> because when the size limit changes (or the wrong one is used) you
>> will get the error.
>
> Per "man spamc":
>
>-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
>Set the maximum message size which will
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
John Hardin writes:
In the thread:
http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-closed/2009-08/msg01318.html
Error code 98 is described as the message being fed being to big
Documentation aside, why are you passing such messages to SA in the
first place
John Hardin writes:
>> In the thread:
>>http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-closed/2009-08/msg01318.html
>>
>> Error code 98 is described as the message being fed being to big
>
> Documentation aside, why are you passing such messages to SA in the
> first place?
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
In the thread:
http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-closed/2009-08/msg01318.html
Error code 98 is described as the message being fed being to big
Documentation aside, why are you passing such messages to SA in the first
place? I'd recommend add
yes, good point. I've updated the POD docs now for 3.3.0.
--j.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 09:01, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> In the thread:
> http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-closed/2009-08/msg01318.html
>
> Error code 98 is described as the message being fed being to big
In the thread:
http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-closed/2009-08/msg01318.html
Error code 98 is described as the message being fed being to big and the
problem resolved. But it is not.
I have a big message:
-rw-r--r-- 1 imaps users 1,4M 2010-01-11 18:05
1263235863
