Bowie Bailey writes:
>> What I find a bit strange is that I see in the environment file:
>> PIDFILE="/var/run/spamd.pid"
>>
>> I see in the service file:
>> PIDFile=/var/run/spamd.pid
>>
>> And with the spamd call the pidfile is again set. Two could be removed
>> in my opinion, but that i
On 10/22/2018 5:39 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Bowie Bailey writes:
>
>>
>> The OPTIONS variable in the service file usually comes from reading a file in
>> /etc/sysconfig. Normally, you would edit that file to adjust the options
>> used in the
>> service file.
> That is not on my system.
That
"Bill Cole" writes:
When I run it again I see in the logging:
Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection
from localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: setuid to
imaps succeeded
Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.n
"Bill Cole" writes:
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection
>> from localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: setuid to
>> imaps succeeded
>> Oct 22 16:47:15
On 22 Oct 2018, at 11:08, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
"Bill Cole" writes:
On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
spamd.
Is sp
Bowie Bailey writes:
> On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>>
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
>> localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
>> Oct
On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>
> When I run it again I see in the logging:
> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
> localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spa
"Bill Cole" writes:
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
>> (EX_IOERR: IO error).
>
> This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
> spamd.
>
> Is spamd running?
Yes, spamd is running.
On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
spamd.
Is spamd running?
Is spamd listening on the socket that spamc is trying to co
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
For example:
$ spamc -L spam
1844399, parsed as 1844399
Oct 22 03:08:20.505 [21322] dbg: channel: current version is 1844399, new
version is 1844399, skipping channel
Oct 22 03:08:20.505 [21322]
10 matches
Mail list logo