Can we drop the conversation off list that is more fitting of a teenage
chat room, please?
Stiff piece of shit, dumped long ago.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 08:05, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 31 May 2018, at 01:52, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > How much do you pay for
> it? Someone has a stiff piece of cellulose in a downward facing bodily
> orifice about spamhaus, it ap
On 31 May 2018, at 01:52, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> How much do you pay for it?
Someone has a stiff piece of cellulose in a downward facing bodily orifice
about spamhaus, it appears.
--
Mirrors contain infinity. Infinity contains more things than you think.
Everything, for a start. Including h
Good job.
How much do you pay for it?
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 16:42, Axb wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 02:35 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > What happens when your
> coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man > in the middle? I mean someone
> that either cuts your link or plays the > role of your pa
On 05/30/2018 02:35 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
What happens when your coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man
in the middle? I mean someone that either cuts your link or plays the
role of your partner while delivering poisoned answers? Good luck...
doesn't happen. I only use lists which
What happens when your coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man in the
middle? I mean someone that either cuts your link or plays the role of your
partner while delivering poisoned answers? Good luck...
On 05/30/2018 07:59 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
You prefer the blind-fold solution: the Microsoft way where you click click and
click again here and there and feel good that you have solved the problem.
Unfortunately it does not work that way. We blacklisted Microsoft IPs without
RDNS, out of
You prefer the blind-fold solution: the Microsoft way where you click click and
click again here and there and feel good that you have solved the problem.
Unfortunately it does not work that way. We blacklisted Microsoft IPs without
RDNS, out of evidence, while Zen has them whitelisted out of no
On 05/30/2018 12:50 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
We spent months herding those free-range animals... Catching them is tedious, because
there is no standard that binds ISPs to just prefix all such domains with
"dyn-".
which is why it's so efficient to use Spamhaus' PBL (included in Zen)
https:
It is not rocket science, just tedious.
Start rejecting the "unknowns", that is, IPs without an RDNS. They are not
bound to any specific domain, but their helos and envelope from never fail
pretending to be from places they do not belong. They are usually rejected by
SPF, but why wasting cpu cy
spam in the spamassassin list...
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 14:53, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 29.05.2018 um 14:31 schrieb Rupert Gallagher: > We reject e-mails from
> both dynamic and unknown domains, and feed the > firewall with their CIDRs.
> The resulting blacklist
On 05/29/2018 06:31 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
We reject e-mails from both dynamic and unknown domains, and feed the
firewall with their CIDRs. The resulting blacklist includes 919 CIDRs,
and keeps growing by itself. It is all automatic. I think ISPs should do
this filtering, even if the EFF w
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> We reject e-mails from both dynamic and unknown domains, and feed the
> firewall with their CIDRs. The resulting blacklist includes 919 CIDRs, and
> keeps growing by itself. It is all automatic. I think ISPs should do this
> filtering
We reject e-mails from both dynamic and unknown domains, and feed the firewall
with their CIDRs. The resulting blacklist includes 919 CIDRs, and keeps growing
by itself. It is all automatic. I think ISPs should do this filtering, even if
the EFF would scream like Donal Duck in favour of net neut
14 matches
Mail list logo
