Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-30 Thread Dianne Skoll
On April 29, 2018 11:11:18 PM EDT, Linda Walsh wrote: > Except users who have their own rules are not likely >doing it in the context of the initial choice of whether or >not to accept the email onto the server. They do in our system. > I.e. it "should" never be the case that use

Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-29 Thread Linda Walsh
Dianne Skoll wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:39:43 -0500 (CDT) David B Funk wrote: [snip] Define two classes of recipients: class A == all users who want everything class B == all users who want "standard" filtering This works if you have a limited number of classes, but in some cases

Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-28 Thread Pedro David Marco
>> Define two classes of recipients: >>    class A == all users who want everything >>    class B == all users who want "standard" filtering Be aware of Class A users...  once they click on where they should not, then as if by magic it was your fault and the s--t hits the fun... (of course whe

Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-27 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:18:28 -0500 (CDT) David B Funk wrote: > If you have that many different classes of recipients, just set the > number of allowed recipients/transaction to one and be done with it. That will cause mail failures. It's not *supposed* to, but I know from experience it will. S

Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-27 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Dianne Skoll wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:39:43 -0500 (CDT) David B Funk wrote: [snip] Define two classes of recipients: class A == all users who want everything class B == all users who want "standard" filtering This works if you have a limited number of classe

Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-27 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:39:43 -0500 (CDT) David B Funk wrote: [snip] > Define two classes of recipients: >class A == all users who want everything >class B == all users who want "standard" filtering This works if you have a limited number of classes, but in some cases users can make thei

Re: Dropping mail

2018-04-27 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Dianne Skoll wrote: Hi, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that in some cases, it is necessary to silently drop spam rather than reject it. This is the situation: An email comes in for two recipients in one SMTP trasaction (ie, a MAIL, two RCPTs and then DATA). On

Dropping mail

2018-04-27 Thread Dianne Skoll
Hi, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that in some cases, it is necessary to silently drop spam rather than reject it. This is the situation: An email comes in for two recipients in one SMTP trasaction (ie, a MAIL, two RCPTs and then DATA). One recipient's rules say to accept. The othe