On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Gnanam wrote:
Matus, this particular point was just out of my curiosity, nothing more
than that. I just wanted to understand the reason for prefixing file
names with 10,20,30,etc. when it can be just actual rule names as file
name like head_tests.cf, html_tests.cf, etc.
All *.cf files under that directory contain rule definitions.
How are their names chosen is not important. What is the point of your
question?
Matus, this particular point was just out of my curiosity, nothing more
than
that. I just wanted to understand the reason for prefixing file names
nothing more than
that. I just wanted to understand the reason for prefixing file names with
10,20,30,etc. when it can be just actual rule names as file name like
head_tests.cf, html_tests.cf, etc.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Difference-in-score-returned-and-sum-of-all-
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
> >
> > Look for the "SCORING OPTIONS" section near the top.
On 12.10.10 22:26, Gnanam wrote:
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Any idea/answer for the 1st question? I can see that file names
SA based on some pattern. It's been prefixed with 10_*.cf, 20_*.cf,
25_*.cf, etc. Any idea on how it's been named?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Difference-in-score-returned-and-sum-of-all-points-tp29940593p29949677.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 10/12/2010 9:53 AM, Gnanam wrote:
>
> Martin Gregorie-2 wrote:
>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org
>>
> 1) I can see that file names are named based on some pattern. It's been
> prefixed with 10_*.cf, 20_*.cf, 25_*.cf, etc. Any idea on how it's been
> named?
>
> 2) I ca
uot;50_scores.cf". For example,
"SUBJ_ALL_CAPS" has 4 scores against it.
score SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.518 1.625 1.197 1.506
Why there are 4 scores against a rule and which score does SA chooses out of
4 & how?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Differe
Jared Hall-2 wrote:
>
> There is a Wiki page on rounding issues within SpamAssassin:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RoundingIssues
>
Thanks for sharing that useful link.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Difference-in-score-returned-and-su
There is a Wiki page on rounding issues within SpamAssassin:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RoundingIssues
- Three decimal rules, one decimal composite, not to mention
dynamic scoring by third party plugins. E-gads.
This bug may be pertinent in your case also:
https://issues.apache.org/
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 04:55 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
>
> Martin Gregorie-2 wrote:
> >
> > Not as far as I know - apart from looking at the rule definitions, of
> > course.
> >
>
> Thanks. Where do I locate all the rule definitions?
>
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org
Martin
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote:
>
> Not as far as I know - apart from looking at the rule definitions, of
> course.
>
Thanks. Where do I locate all the rule definitions?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Difference-in-score-returned-and-sum-of-all-points-tp29940
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 04:22 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> Is it possible to get/see 2 decimal places of the rules, particularly for
> low scoring rules?
>
Not as far as I know - apart from looking at the rule definitions, of
course.
Martin
Is it possible to get/see 2 decimal places of the rules, particularly for
low scoring rules?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Difference-in-score-returned-and-sum-of-all-points-tp29940593p29942238.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 23:37 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
> My question is, though SA reports 2.8 points at the top, on summing-up each
> points from the Content analysis details, it is only 2.7 points. Why SA is
> reporting/showing an increase by 0.1 point from its Content analysis details
> points sum?
>
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Gnanam wrote:
> My question is, though SA reports 2.8 points at the top, on
> summing-up each points from the Content analysis details, it is only
> 2.7 points. Why SA is reporting/showing an increase by 0.1 point
> from its Content analysis details poin
with a linked image
-0.0 NO_RECEIVEDInformational: message has no Received headers
Regards,
Gnanam
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Difference-in-score-returned-and-sum-of-all-points-tp29940593p29940593.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing li
16 matches
Mail list logo