Re: Difference between sa-learn --spam and spamassassin -rda

2005-06-10 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Friday, Jun 10th 2005 at 11:49 -0400, quoth Theo Van Dinter: =>On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> If I pipe it through sa -r -d I don't ever get a report to confirm from => =>FYI: there's no point in adding -d to the report line. In fact, you're just =>causing

Re: Difference between sa-learn --spam and spamassassin -rda

2005-06-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: > If I pipe it through sa -r -d I don't ever get a report to confirm from FYI: there's no point in adding -d to the report line. In fact, you're just causing SA to do more work. (report already removes the markup, but -d causes the

Difference between sa-learn --spam and spamassassin -rda

2005-06-10 Thread Steven W. Orr
I have both spamcop spamcop_from_address [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamcop_to_address [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my local.cf and when I get spam coming through I always forward it to spamcop. I also pipe it through sa-learn --spam but my question is: If I pipe it through sa -r -d I don't ever get a repor