On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Matt Kettler stated:
> At 06:27 PM 12/14/2004, Nix wrote:
>>dig doesn't use the local nameserver unless you're looking up a name
>>there: it queries remote nameservers directly.
>
> No it does not. By default, dig uses the nameservers in
> resolv.conf. Check your dig output so
At 06:27 PM 12/14/2004, Nix wrote:
dig doesn't use the local nameserver unless you're looking up a name
there: it queries remote nameservers directly.
No it does not. By default, dig uses the nameservers in resolv.conf. Check
your dig output sometime.
Performed on a box where resolv.conf points
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Matt Kettler uttered the following:
> At 11:47 AM 12/14/2004, Jon Dossey wrote:
>>A lot of people are having problems resolving using the loopback address
>>(127.0.0.1), try using an IP address that is bound to one of your NIC's.
>
> That's odd.. I myself have never done it an
From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 12:46 PM Tuesday, 12/14/2004, jdow wrote -=>
> >From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > I realized that since my reboot last week that network tests are no
longer
> > > running. Any hints on tracking down why? I'm stilling running 3.0, on
> >
At 12:46 PM Tuesday, 12/14/2004, jdow wrote -=>
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I realized that since my reboot last week that network tests are no longer
> running. Any hints on tracking down why? I'm stilling running 3.0, on
> Fedora Core 2 using spamd. SA is launched using spamc in
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I realized that since my reboot last week that network tests are no longer
> running. Any hints on tracking down why? I'm stilling running 3.0, on
> Fedora Core 2 using spamd. SA is launched using spamc in /etc/procmailrc:
>
> :0fw
> * < 20
> | /usr
--On Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:37 PM -0500 Matt Kettler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Keneth, can you double-check your resolv.conf. Is 127.0.0.1 the only
listed nameserver? In the past I've seen issues where Net::DNS only used
the first nameserver from resolv.conf, and would fail all DNS querie
> > Hmm, just retried it twice more, and the test succeeds on these two
> > tests. Perhaps Net::DNS gives up too quickly?
>
> Found the section in "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" on
> dns_available and
> changed it to use a domain my server is master for, to
> guarantee that it
> has the records on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
> At 10:17 AM 12/14/2004, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >I realized that since my reboot last week that network tests are no longer
> >running. Any hints on tracking down why? I'm stilling running 3.0, on
> >Fedora Core 2 using spamd.
At 11:47 AM 12/14/2004, Jon Dossey wrote:
A lot of people are having problems resolving using the loopback address
(127.0.0.1), try using an IP address that is bound to one of your NIC's.
That's odd.. I myself have never done it any other way.. of course, I
always make sure that 127.0.0.1 has all
--On Tuesday, December 14, 2004 7:58 AM -0800 Kenneth Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, just retried it twice more, and the test succeeds on these two
tests. Perhaps Net::DNS gives up too quickly?
Found the section in "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" on dns_available and
changed it to use a d
> --On Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:43 AM -0500 Matt Kettler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd start off simple...
> >
> > spamassassin --lint -D
> >
> > See what that can tell you. If that's showing network tests working,
try
> > adding -D to spamd's start up (note: spamd not spam
--On Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:43 AM -0500 Matt Kettler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd start off simple...
spamassassin --lint -D
See what that can tell you. If that's showing network tests working, try
adding -D to spamd's start up (note: spamd not spamc) and check your
syslogs. (wa
At 10:17 AM 12/14/2004, Kenneth Porter wrote:
I realized that since my reboot last week that network tests are no longer
running. Any hints on tracking down why? I'm stilling running 3.0, on
Fedora Core 2 using spamd. SA is launched using spamc in /etc/procmailrc:
I'd start off simple...
I realized that since my reboot last week that network tests are no longer
running. Any hints on tracking down why? I'm stilling running 3.0, on
Fedora Core 2 using spamd. SA is launched using spamc in /etc/procmailrc:
:0fw
* < 20
| /usr/bin/spamc
15 matches
Mail list logo
