Richard Frovarp wrote:
>
> Make sure you are running a local caching name server. Even with a
> real name server on the same subnet, I have heard of massive delays in
> DNS lookups as a result. This in turn causes a massive slowdown in the
> processing of mail.
You are absolutely correct. However -
Jason Haar wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:35:30PM -0600, Mike French wrote:
Do these normally timeout or do they need to be removed from a rule? I'm
thinking they are timed out because nothing was found?
The problem is likely related to your nam
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:35:30PM -0600, Mike French wrote:
>
>> Do these normally timeout or do they need to be removed from a rule? I'm
>> thinking they are timed out because nothing was found?
>>
>
> The problem is likely related to your name servers. There sho
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:35:30PM -0600, Mike French wrote:
> Do these normally timeout or do they need to be removed from a rule? I'm
> thinking they are timed out because nothing was found?
The problem is likely related to your name servers. There should always
be a response, even if it's "not
Postfix/Amavis-new
Spamassassin 3.1.4
I ran Amavis debug-sa and I'm curious if the is normal?
[5846] dbg: dns: success for 9 of 26 queries
[5846] dbg: dns: timeout for habeas-firsttrusted after 13 seconds
[5846] dbg: dns: timeout for njabl after 13 seconds
[5846] dbg: dns: timeout fo
