Am 04.06.2016 um 14:40 schrieb jpff:
Thank you -- did not realise the /etc/default/unbound file existed. It
was set to forward. Will remind me how I prefer instllatins from source
for critical programs.
Unbound installed from Debian Whezzy
nonsense - you don't need to compile anything from
On 2016-06-04 07:56, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
ACk for unbound.
ACK for better dns books to newcommers like me :)
Is is a very versatile, fast and stable recursive nameserver. We run it
as
Recursive DNS at ISPs where, for example at one location, it serves +20
million customers.
#/etc/bi
Thank you -- did not realise the /etc/default/unbound file existed. It was
set to forward. Will remind me how I prefer instllatins from source for
critical programs.
Unbound installed from Debian Whezzy
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 03-06-16 18:19, jpff wrote:
X-Originating-<%
Mailserver is in this house, running Debian.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Andy Balholm wrote:
I was wondering if your mail server is an on-premises physical machine, or
something hosted in a data center somewhere. If it’s in a data center, what
data center?
On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:47 AM, John wrot
Am 04.06.2016 um 11:41 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 03-06-16 18:19, jpff wrote:
X-Originating-<%= hostname %>-IP: [217.155.197.248]
OK I expect to get flamed but anyway
I as still seeing the occasional URIBL_BLOCKED
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
On 03-06-16 18:19, jpff wrote:
> X-Originating-<%= hostname %>-IP: [217.155.197.248]
>
> OK I expect to get flamed but anyway
>
> I run a couple of mailers, one of which is small with ~5 users. For
> years I ran dnsmasq which was easy to set up and only gave occasional
> troubles with the RB
* Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 03.06.2016 um 18:40 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> >On 2016-06-03 18:33, Andy Balholm wrote:
> >>I was using unbound as a local resolver. All queries were going to
> >>127.0.0.1, and there was no forwarding set up.
> >
> >that disqullify unbound then
>
> please stop spreadi
Am 03.06.2016 um 18:40 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 2016-06-03 18:33, Andy Balholm wrote:
I was using unbound as a local resolver. All queries were going to
127.0.0.1, and there was no forwarding set up.
that disqullify unbound then
please stop spreading bullshit
unbound works perfectly as r
I was wondering if your mail server is an on-premises physical machine, or
something hosted in a data center somewhere. If it’s in a data center, what
data center?
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:47 AM, John wrote:
>
> The mail server is my machine with no other server, unless I have
> misunderstood
On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> if the first hop in dns is 127.0.0.1 it works
>
> that's not how +trace works
oh, nevermind - you are right. It will query for the root servers from your
configured resolvers.
--
Daniel J. Luke
On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:30 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> dig +trace ipv4.google.com
>
> if the first hop in dns is 127.0.0.1 it works
that's not how +trace works
from the manpage:
When tracing is enabled, dig makes iterative queries to resolve
the name being looked up. It wil
On 2016-06-03 18:33, Andy Balholm wrote:
I was using unbound as a local resolver. All queries were going to
127.0.0.1, and there was no forwarding set up.
that disqullify unbound then
I was using unbound as a local resolver. All queries were going to 127.0.0.1,
and there was no forwarding set up.
Andy
On 2016-06-03 18:23, Andy Balholm wrote:
Where is your mail server hosted. URIBL blocks queries from some cloud
providers (including DigitalOcean) unless you have a subscription. For
a while I had a mail server hosted on DO, and I was paying more for my
URIBL subscription than for my hosting.
h
On 2016-06-03 18:19, jpff wrote:
I as still seeing the occasional URIBL_BLOCKED
do your homework :=)
dig +trace ipv4.google.com
if the first hop in dns is 127.0.0.1 it works
make sure /etc/resolv.conf only have one single line with nameserver
127.0.0.1 nothing more nothing less
dig is pa
Where is your mail server hosted. URIBL blocks queries from some cloud
providers (including DigitalOcean) unless you have a subscription. For a while
I had a mail server hosted on DO, and I was paying more for my URIBL
subscription than for my hosting.
Andy
X-Originating-<%= hostname %>-IP: [217.155.197.248]
OK I expect to get flamed but anyway
I run a couple of mailers, one of which is small with ~5 users. For
years I ran dnsmasq which was easy to set up and only gave occasional
troubles with the RBL lookups being rejected from my ISP (hi Zen!
17 matches
Mail list logo
