Quanah,
* Quanah Gibson-Mount :
> --On Friday, February 15, 2013 5:01 PM -0800 John Hardin
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> >>Does anyone tweak the DKIM scores given by SA? There are plenty of
> >>scenarios where DKIM has failed, yet SA does not give the emai
--On Friday, February 15, 2013 5:01 PM -0800 John Hardin
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Does anyone tweak the DKIM scores given by SA? There are plenty of
scenarios where DKIM has failed, yet SA does not give the email a
particularly high spam mark. 3 example test
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Does anyone tweak the DKIM scores given by SA? There are plenty of scenarios
where DKIM has failed, yet SA does not give the email a particularly high
spam mark. 3 example test cases below. I guess I was expecting SA would
score DKIM failures
Does anyone tweak the DKIM scores given by SA? There are plenty of
scenarios where DKIM has failed, yet SA does not give the email a
particularly high spam mark. 3 example test cases below. I guess I was
expecting SA would score DKIM failures more aggressively if there are
problems with the
