Re: DKIM, SPF and Bayesian Learning

2015-07-22 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/21/2015 8:55 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: It seems that if DKIM or SPF is verified, the bayesian learning doesn't matter. X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 If you me

Re: DKIM, SPF and Bayesian Learning

2015-07-21 Thread Bill Cole
On 21 Jul 2015, at 20:55, Roman Gelfand wrote: It seems that if DKIM or SPF is verified, the bayesian learning doesn't matter. Not so. Perhaps you need to refresh your understanding of what SpamAssassin is. It is not a collection of binary switches, but rather a scoring system consisting of

DKIM, SPF and Bayesian Learning

2015-07-21 Thread Roman Gelfand
It seems that if DKIM or SPF is verified, the bayesian learning doesn't matter. X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2