>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:39 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: 'Stuart Gall'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Custom Rule question
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>&g
Chris Santerre wrote:
>Eval solution: Count hits, yes. Change score based on hits, no.
>
>
Chris, using an eval solution you could do ranges, much like bayes does.
It would be computationally efficient if done the way bayes does it too
(storing the result on the first call, and only checking va
Chris Santerre wrote:
> Long answer: Multiple meta rules. Take to much computational effort.
> The regex isn't slick for these type of rules either.
The multiple meta rules are the easiest approach to doing this. I have a
number of rulesets which use this trick to count different things. Not
exa
>-Original Message-
>From: Stuart Gall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:58 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Custom Rule question
>
>
>Hello,
>Sometimes when I create a custom rule I want the score to be added for
>e
Hello,
Sometimes when I create a custom rule I want the score to be added for
each match in the body. and not just an on or off rule.
Is there anyway to do this?
TIA
Stuart Gall
