On 9/20/2018 6:35 AM, Alex Woick wrote:
> Kevin A. McGrail schrieb am 19.09.2018 um 22:28:
>>
>> Alex, sought isn't published, correct? We have to get sought2 relit now
>> that 3.4.2 is in the can.
>>
> Correct, sought isn't published with 3.4.2. It's only in the 3.4.1
> Fedora/Redhat rpm distribu
On 9/20/2018 9:03 AM, micah anderson wrote:
> "Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
>
>> There are people asking me to put KAM.cf under the default sa-update
>> crypto signature. Technically, it's easy. But it would have to be
>> carefully considered as it's not a project ruleset. Thoughts on that?
> I wo
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> There are people asking me to put KAM.cf under the default sa-update
> crypto signature. Technically, it's easy. But it would have to be
> carefully considered as it's not a project ruleset. Thoughts on that?
I would be interested in KAM as part of an update chann
Kevin A. McGrail schrieb am 19.09.2018 um 22:28:
Alex, sought isn't published, correct? We have to get sought2 relit now
that 3.4.2 is in the can.
Correct, sought isn't published with 3.4.2. It's only in the 3.4.1
Fedora/Redhat rpm distributions until now, from where it should be
removed by
On 9/19/2018 3:48 PM, Chris Pollock wrote:
> I noticed in a post that Kevin McGrail made that the 'sought' rules are
> no longer published. So, my update-channels file that SA-Update reads
> should have only one entry:
>
> updates.spamassassin.org
>
> Is that correct
>
Alex, sought isn't published,
I noticed in a post that Kevin McGrail made that the 'sought' rules are
no longer published. So, my update-channels file that SA-Update reads
should have only one entry:
updates.spamassassin.org
Is that correct
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
14:38:23 up 3