On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 18:32 -0400, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> From: Martin Gregorie
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to run another spamd on a different machine for
> rule development and testing? Or perhaps just running as a different
> 'test' user, and then ignore log messages for that user in the statisti
From: Martin Gregorie
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:54:11 +0100
How difficult would it be to let spamc control spamd's logging output on
a per-message basis?
My reason for asking is this: I maintain a body of spam that I use to
develop and regression test local rules and, du
How difficult would it be to let spamc control spamd's logging output on
a per-message basis?
My reason for asking is this: I maintain a body of spam that I use to
develop and regression test local rules and, during rule development,
use spamc to pass the test messages through my only copy of spa