Re: Controlling spamd logging from spamc

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 18:32 -0400, Jeff Mincy wrote: > From: Martin Gregorie > > Wouldn't it be easier to run another spamd on a different machine for > rule development and testing? Or perhaps just running as a different > 'test' user, and then ignore log messages for that user in the statisti

Re: Controlling spamd logging from spamc

2009-06-04 Thread Jeff Mincy
From: Martin Gregorie Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:54:11 +0100 How difficult would it be to let spamc control spamd's logging output on a per-message basis? My reason for asking is this: I maintain a body of spam that I use to develop and regression test local rules and, du

Controlling spamd logging from spamc

2009-06-02 Thread Martin Gregorie
How difficult would it be to let spamc control spamd's logging output on a per-message basis? My reason for asking is this: I maintain a body of spam that I use to develop and regression test local rules and, during rule development, use spamc to pass the test messages through my only copy of spa