Re: Content-Length mismatch

2006-04-19 Thread jdow
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It seems like spamd won't scan anything over 8122 bytes. First I Spamd will normally scan files up to at least 250kb. This sounds like you have some sort of problem with the sockets you are using. Or an EXIM issue. {^_^}

Re: Content-Length mismatch

2006-04-19 Thread Loren Wilton
> It seems like spamd won't scan anything over 8122 bytes. First I Spamd will normally scan files up to at least 250kb. This sounds like you have some sort of problem with the sockets you are using. Loren

Content-Length mismatch

2006-04-18 Thread George
g the same message to less than 8KB scans correctly. Apr 18 17:58:18 dnsbureau spamd[345]: spamd: bad protocol: header error: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 69800 bytes, got 8122 bytes) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1676, line 302.\n Apr 18 18:09:58 dnsbureau spamd[345]: spamd: bad protocol: hea

Re: Sober.I virus variant gets Malformed SA reply. SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header line: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected...

2004-12-03 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:07:48AM -0500, Rob Kudyba wrote: > "Malformed SA reply. SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header line: (Content-Length > mismatch: Expected 77970 bytes, got 77972 bytes)" > > This doesn't seem to happen on other OS'es, e.g., OS X/Darwin or > Solaris,

Sober.I virus variant gets Malformed SA reply. SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header line: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected...

2004-12-03 Thread Rob Kudyba
We're running ClamAV .75 and SA 3.01 on RH8 and 9 boxes and we are finding that mails with the Sober.I variant get pass ClamAV 0.75 and then SA replies with: "Malformed SA reply. SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header line: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 77970 bytes, got 77972 bytes)"