Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules

2014-06-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 6/17/2014 4:53 PM, Dave Pooser wrote: On 6/17/14 3:31 PM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: On 6/17/2014 4:22 PM, Dave Pooser wrote: Did any decision on this get reached? Yes, I believe it was committed to trunk and considered resolved. Presumably that will be released in 3.4.1 -- is there a ta

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules

2014-06-17 Thread Dave Pooser
On 6/17/14 3:31 PM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: >On 6/17/2014 4:22 PM, Dave Pooser wrote: >> Did any decision on this get reached? >> >Yes, I believe it was committed to trunk and considered resolved. Presumably that will be released in 3.4.1 -- is there a target date for that release? -- Dave Po

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules

2014-06-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 6/17/2014 4:22 PM, Dave Pooser wrote: Did any decision on this get reached? I'm tired enough of that particular flavor of spam that I'm considering making David's modifications locally to Message.pm -- but obviously I'd prefer to leave the core modules unmolested if there's an "official" fix

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules (was: Re: Bayes refinement)

2014-06-17 Thread Dave Pooser
On 5/22/14 6:48 PM, "Karsten Bräckelmann" wrote: >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:34 -0500, David B Funk wrote: >> After doing some experimenting with that code I came up with something >>that >> I'd argue is more semantically correct: >> >> # if we've got a long series of blank lines, limit them

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules (was: Re: Bayes refinement)

2014-05-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:34 -0500, David B Funk wrote: > After doing some experimenting with that code I came up with something that > I'd argue is more semantically correct: > > # if we've got a long series of blank lines, limit them > if (defined $start) { >my $max_blank_lines

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules

2014-05-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 17:43 -0500, David B Funk wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2014, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Any number up to 11 of consecutive newlines can be matched with rawbody > > rules. However, 12 or more consecutive newlines will be squeezed and > > replaced by exactly two newlines. > > I

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules (was: Re: Bayes refinement)

2014-05-22 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 22 May 2014, David B Funk wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 03:12 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: [snip..] The number of continuation lines equals the number of newlines in the test-case. Well, up until 12, that is. :-/ Any number up to

Re: Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules (was: Re: Bayes refinement)

2014-05-22 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 03:12 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: [snip..] The number of continuation lines equals the number of newlines in the test-case. Well, up until 12, that is. :-/ Any number up to 11 of consecutive newlines can be matched w

Consecutive Newlines in Rawbody Rules (was: Re: Bayes refinement)

2014-05-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 03:12 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > In either case, having a sample would speed up this ping-pong style > debugging. And I am curious. ;) Mind putting your sample up a pastebin? Ian sent me the original message off-list. It indeed contains about 16 consecutive newlines