Re: CommuniGate Pro Received header (was: whitelist_from_rcvd not working)

2008-04-10 Thread Victor Sudakov
SM wrote: > >This is the standard CommuniGate Pro "Received:" header. > >When HELO matches the hostname, this header always looks this way, > >with the word "verified" added to it. > > SpamAssassin is not parsing that "Received:" header as one with a > hostname which has been "verified". [dd] >

Re: CommuniGate Pro Received header (was: whitelist_from_rcvd not working)

2008-04-10 Thread Victor Sudakov
SM wrote: > >whitelist_from_rcvd now works, but not quite in the manner I have > >expected. In fact, it works only if the relay is NOT in the > >trusted_networks list. > > Can you post the debug output? In this case 212.73.124.135 is trusted so the sender was not whitelisted!!! http://vas.tomsk.

Re: CommuniGate Pro Received header (was: whitelist_from_rcvd not working)

2008-04-10 Thread SM
At 23:03 09-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote: whitelist_from_rcvd now works, but not quite in the manner I have expected. In fact, it works only if the relay is NOT in the trusted_networks list. Can you post the debug output? I wonder if this is by design. In my opinion, whitelisting should alwa

Re: CommuniGate Pro Received header (was: whitelist_from_rcvd not working)

2008-04-09 Thread Victor Sudakov
SM wrote: > Hi Victor, > At 21:40 09-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >This is the standard CommuniGate Pro "Received:" header. > >When HELO matches the hostname, this header always looks this way, > >with the word "verified" added to it. > > SpamAssassin is not parsing that "Received:" header as

CommuniGate Pro Received header (was: whitelist_from_rcvd not working)

2008-04-09 Thread SM
Hi Victor, At 21:40 09-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote: This is the standard CommuniGate Pro "Received:" header. When HELO matches the hostname, this header always looks this way, with the word "verified" added to it. SpamAssassin is not parsing that "Received:" header as one with a hostname whi