Hello Benny,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 6:59:39 PM, you wrote:
BP> there is plenty of other rules that can adjust
BP> the complete scores up or down
Very few have such a high score, that's my point.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpcRjCSfz4Wq
Den 2012-06-13 18:20, Niamh Holding skrev:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 5:12:16 PM, you wrote:
BP> true if it only hits spam and not ham
That's the point this high scoring rule hits ham and causes false
positives.
there is just one rule in spamassassin ?, your clams is currect if i
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 5:12:16 PM, you wrote:
BP> true if it only hits spam and not ham
That's the point this high scoring rule hits ham and causes false
positives.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgppjprdU8CWc.pgp
Description: P
Den 2012-06-13 08:24, Axb skrev:
Not officially, but if the SOUGHT creator is reading, he may get back
to you offlist.
who have set him read only here ?
Den 2012-06-13 07:53, Niamh Holding skrev:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 1:36:37 AM, you wrote:
BP> nope sought rules just needs more ham
Unless a rule is almost perfect then for it to apply 80% of the
default spam identification score is probably excessive.
true if it only hits spa
On 06/13/2012 08:16 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 7:07:59 AM, you wrote:
A> Nobody stops you from changing the SOUGHT rules' scores if you think
A> they're scored too high.
I'm keeping an eye on the false positives caused by them to make that
call.
Is there
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 7:07:59 AM, you wrote:
A> Nobody stops you from changing the SOUGHT rules' scores if you think
A> they're scored too high.
I'm keeping an eye on the false positives caused by them to make that
call.
Is there anywhere we can send misscored ham to help impro
On 06/13/2012 07:53 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 1:36:37 AM, you wrote:
BP> nope sought rules just needs more ham
Unless a rule is almost perfect then for it to apply 80% of the
default spam identification score is probably excessive.
Nobody stops you fr
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 1:36:37 AM, you wrote:
BP> nope sought rules just needs more ham
Unless a rule is almost perfect then for it to apply 80% of the
default spam identification score is probably excessive.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@full
Den 2012-06-12 09:02, Niamh Holding skrev:
Though I must admit I'm finding the score of 4 a bit high and it's
causing misclassification of the occasional ham.
nope sought rules just needs more ham
Hello Christopher,
Tuesday, June 5, 2012, 5:26:43 PM, you wrote:
CT> The scoring rule is 4.0 JM_SOUGHT_3, which is one of the "sought
CT> channel" rules distributed (and regularly updated) by the
CT> sought.rules.yerp.org channel in SpamAssassin [1].
Though I must admit I'm finding the score of
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:46:27PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Those rules don't exist in the current sought rule set. You *are*
> keeping the sought rules updated, right?
>
> What is the date of your 20_sought.cf file?
My file dated from a copy made Monday morning off our spam check server.
I
On 6/5/2012 12:33 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 06:26 PM, Christopher Tiwald wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>> A) These are just sub rules for use in a meta. As a specialist in
>>> meta rules, just because you hit a sub rule doesn't matter. What
>>>
On 06/05/2012 06:26 PM, Christopher Tiwald wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
A) These are just sub rules for use in a meta. As a specialist in
meta rules, just because you hit a sub rule doesn't matter. What
matters is if it triggers a scoring rule. Does
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> A) These are just sub rules for use in a meta. As a specialist in
> meta rules, just because you hit a sub rule doesn't matter. What
> matters is if it triggers a scoring rule. Does it?
>
> B) I don't recognize those rules or k
Den 2012-06-05 17:31, Brett Schenker skrev:
Has anyone else tackled the problem and have a solution? Thanks for
any help!
souch rules needs more ham from that editor to compensate for keep away
from hitting this as a spam sign
On 6/5/2012 11:31 AM, Brett Schenker wrote:
Hey everyone, I'm new to the list and so glad it exists.
We're running into an issue with CKEditor,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10890407/ckeditors-html-artifacts-trigger-spamassassin-can-you-turn-ckeditors-html-mod
and the following rules,
b
Hey everyone, I'm new to the list and so glad it exists.
We're running into an issue with CKEditor,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10890407/ckeditors-html-artifacts-trigger-spamassassin-can-you-turn-ckeditors-html-modand
the following rules,
body __SEEK_A5MEIH / cellspacing=\"0\"><\/
18 matches
Mail list logo
