Dirk Bonengel wrote:
>>> it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on waiting for a reply from
>>> ctyme.ixhash.net .
>>>
>>> The strange thing is that it consumes a lot of CPU while hanging... Some
>>> problem in the ctyme.ixhash.net side? Anybody is experiencing the same?
I see the same problem: SA hanging wit
Bill Landry schrieb:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:04 AM
it's WORKING
Well,
it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on waiting for a reply from ctyme.ixhash.net .
The strange thing is t
RobertH schrieb:
is there anything wrong with still using an older pre 1.5.x version of
iXhash?
is there a problem that makes an upgrade recommended?
OR
is there a problem that forces up to upgrade?
- rh
Short anwer: No. I tried to improve the code by adding new functionailty
but the ol
Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> Bill Landry wrote:
>> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>>
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:04 AM
it's WORKING
>>> Well,
>>>
>>> it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on
Bill Landry wrote:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:04 AM
it's WORKING
Well,
it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on waiting for a reply from ctyme.ixhash.net .
The strange thing is t
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:04 AM
>>
>> it's WORKING
>
> Well,
>
> it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on waiting for a reply from ctyme.ixhash.net .
>
> The strange thing is that it c
Yep. Timeouts have stopped on the node that I switched back to iXhash 1.0.1.
-Original Message-
From: Rose, Bobby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:22 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Bug in iXhash plugin - fixed version available
The old
d have reverted.
--
Adam Stephens
Network Specialist - Email & DNS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: RobertH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:59 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Bug in iXhash plugin - fixe
: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:59 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Bug in iXhash plugin - fixed version available
is there anything wrong with still using an older pre 1.5.x version of
iXhash?
is there a problem that makes an upgrade recommended?
OR
is there a problem that fo
is there anything wrong with still using an older pre 1.5.x version of
iXhash?
is there a problem that makes an upgrade recommended?
OR
is there a problem that forces up to upgrade?
- rh
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:08:32PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
>> I just tried again with this 1.5.2 version and on box it times out querying
>> and on another it seems to run but no hits again. Both my boxes are SA3.2.5.
>>
>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:08:32PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> I just tried again with this 1.5.2 version and on box it times out querying
> and on another it seems to run but no hits again. Both my boxes are SA3.2.5.
>
> Does anyone have a message that is known to have hashes on any of iXhash
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:49 PM
To: 'Marc Perkel'; 'Dirk Bonengel'
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Bug in iXhash plugin - fixed version available
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:04 AM
>
> it's WORKING
Well,
it hangs my SA 3.2.4 setup on waiting for a reply from ctyme.ixhash.net .
The strange thing is that it consumes a lot of CPU while hanging... Some
it's WORKING
Dirk Bonengel wrote:
OK, I found the bug.
I just released a fixed release. Thanks to Lars Uhlmann for finding
the culprit and delivering a fix.
Problem was the regular expression checking the IP returned if it
belongs to the 127.x.x.x range.
Hmm, I had this working before..
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:33:07PM +0100, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> Folks,
>
> as some of you already noticed I f... up the last (1.5) release of the
> iXhash plugin.
> Plain simple a wrong regular expression practically disables hash #1.
>
> I just uploaded a fixed version to ixhash.sf.net that run
OK, I found the bug.
I just released a fixed release. Thanks to Lars Uhlmann for finding the
culprit and delivering a fix.
Problem was the regular expression checking the IP returned if it
belongs to the 127.x.x.x range.
Hmm, I had this working before
Soryy again for the trouble
Dirk
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 11:32 +0100, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> I'm looking into it. Only thing - seems to work here.
The reason why hash one is broken is the "workaround" introduced into
version 1.5.
$body_copy =~ s/[[:graph:]]+//go;
This can not work.
Hash one is supposed to do this: Condense all
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 06:30:20 -0600
> Von: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Bug in iXhash plugin - fixed version available
> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 4:32 am, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
&g
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 4:32 am, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> I'm looking into it. Only thing - seems to work here.
> Maybe one of you can send me his .cf file per PM?
>
> Dirk
>
>
Dirk, running spamassassin -D -t on a spam I see this:
[3677] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::iXhash
I'm looking into it. Only thing - seems to work here.
Maybe one of you can send me his .cf file per PM?
Dirk
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:12:45 +
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> An: Spamass
> Betreff: Re: Re: Bug in iXhash plugin - fixed
On Dec 2, 2008 4:05am, Martin Knipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dirk, Hi Marc,
Am 02.12.2008 05:08 schrieb Marc Perkel:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> I'm not getting any hits on the new version either.
>
Yes, ... same here. Just installed the 1.5.1 Version yesterday
an did not get one hit in abou
Hi Dirk, Hi Marc,
Am 02.12.2008 05:08 schrieb Marc Perkel:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> I'm not getting any hits on the new version either.
>
Yes, ... same here. Just installed the 1.5.1 Version yesterday
an did not get one hit in about 500 messages.
Greetings,
Martin
Hi Dirk,
I'm not getting any hits on the new version either.
Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Folks,
as some of you already noticed I f... up the last (1.5) release of the
iXhash plugin.
Plain simple a wrong regular expression practically disables hash #1.
I just uploaded a fixed version to ixhash.sf.n
Folks,
as some of you already noticed I f... up the last (1.5) release of the
iXhash plugin.
Plain simple a wrong regular expression practically disables hash #1.
I just uploaded a fixed version to ixhash.sf.net that runs the correct
RE ( on a modified version of the email's body to circumven
25 matches
Mail list logo
