Jonas Eckerman wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>
>>Received: (private information removed)
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>It just boggles my mind why anyone would go through that much trouble
>>to deliberately damage a header line, rather than just delete it.
>>
>>
>
>The only reason I can think
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Received: (private information removed)
It just boggles my mind why anyone would go through that much trouble
to deliberately damage a header line, rather than just delete it.
The only reason I can think of for that (in this case) is that ther want to
keep those h
Yep, a problem I continually get is that people want to make email into
something that it is not.
It's not a credit card or an ATM card or Driver's license or a Visa or etc.
Joe
jay plesset wrote:
It never fails to amaze me now many mail server admins ask for ways to
break the RFC's in the in
It never fails to amaze me now many mail server admins ask for ways to
break the RFC's in the interest of "security". I do tech support on
mail servers, and get requests to configure out server for this kind of
thing weekly. . .
jay
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Well, I tried to contact some p
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Well, I tried to contact some people responsible for
> the servers below that what they were doing was broken,
> including citing chapter and verse where in RFC-2822 in
> syntax of the Received: lines was spec'd out:
>
>
> It just boggles my mind why anyone would go
Well, I tried to contact some people responsible for
the servers below that what they were doing was broken,
including citing chapter and verse where in RFC-2822 in
syntax of the Received: lines was spec'd out:
Received: from Gate2-sandiego.nmci.navy.mil (gate2-sandiego.nmci.navy.mil
[138.163.0.4
