On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Andy Dorman wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:03:01 -0600:
>
> > We were just hoping someone else in this group would have run into this
> > situation and have a suggestion, given how ubiquitous webmail is these
> > days. If
> > not, we will keep pounding at
LuKreme wrote on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:57:09 -0700:
> Received: from 67.164.162.51
> (SquirrelMail authenticated user kreme)
> by webmail.covisp.net with HTTP;
> Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:51:13 -0500 (EST)
>
> I don't hit botnet...
but that might be because of the "authenticated"
On 28-Jan-2009, at 10:03, Andy Dorman wrote:
Received: by beatrice.ironicdesign.com (Postfix, from userid 112) id
E92BC148C16A; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:03:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from rbn1s-216-180-93-118.adsl.hiwaay.net
(rbn1s-216-180-93-118.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.93.118]) by
mail.homefreema
Andy Dorman wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:03:01 -0600:
> We were just hoping someone else in this group would have run into this
> situation and have a suggestion, given how ubiquitous webmail is these days.
> If
> not, we will keep pounding at it.
Well, the easiest and fastest solution is to
John Rudd wrote:
Is that your own webmail server (run by you, or run by a service you
use/trust/contract-with/etc.)? Because, a webmail transaction
shouldn't go to the generic internet anymore than a desktop client
should, IMO ... so they're in the same boat as everyone else.
John, good point
Is that your own webmail server (run by you, or run by a service you
use/trust/contract-with/etc.)? Because, a webmail transaction
shouldn't go to the generic internet anymore than a desktop client
should, IMO ... so they're in the same boat as everyone else.
That host should go to their local MT
We have found Botnet to be very helpful in trapping spam generated by
misbehaving home computers and office workstations. So we want to avoid making
changes that could reduce it's effectiveness.
However, we are having a problem with it also catching legitimate email sent
from webmail hosts.
