So I guess I will put a complaint in
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:46 AM
To: Jean-Paul Natola; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: bonded sender
At 10:07 PM 11/30/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>I was j
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 10:07 PM 11/30/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I was just curious ( as it's the first time I came across this)
As to how this can be
-4.3 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED RBL: Sender is in Bonded Sender Program (trusted
relay)
At 10:07 PM 11/30/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I was just curious ( as it's the first time I came across this)
As to how this can be
-4.3 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTEDRBL: Sender is in Bonded Sender Program (trusted
relay)
[IronPort Bonded Sender - <http://www.bondedse
Hi all
I was just curious ( as it's the first time I came across this)
As to how this can be
-4.3 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTEDRBL: Sender is in Bonded Sender Program (trusted
relay)
[IronPort Bonded Sender - <http://www.bondedsender.com>]
On an Oil of olay message??
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Most people having problems with BSP are in category 2, or consider
subscriber mail to be spam. (There is a lot of spam-ish subscriber mail
out there, my users subscribe to lots of it, on purpose, it's often hard
for me to tell without asking the recipi
x27;re moving away from our current antispam setup which uses the bonded
> sender list. In doing some checking to see how I want to setup SA, I
> noticed that currently many messages that look like spam are being
> whitelisted by our current setup because of the bonded sender list.
>
> >Be aware though that MANY spammers forge bonded sender tags. If you have
> >one of the older methods of checking bonded sender, it is very probable
that
> >a lot of your failures are forgeries that the newer bonded sender methods
> >should correctly detect.
>
>
At 10:18 AM 8/15/2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
My very minimal experience with Bonded Sender is that the people who
contract directly are mostly fairly legit. The people who contract through
the clever guilt-sharing arrangement at constant contact are spammers.
Agreed.
Be aware though that
My very minimal experience with Bonded Sender is that the people who
contract directly are mostly fairly legit. The people who contract through
the clever guilt-sharing arrangement at constant contact are spammers.
Be aware though that MANY spammers forge bonded sender tags. If you have
one of
Russ Uhte wrote:
We're moving away from our current antispam setup which uses the bonded
sender list. In doing some checking to see how I want to setup SA, I
noticed that currently many messages that look like spam are being
whitelisted by our current setup because of the bonded sender
We're moving away from our current antispam setup which uses the bonded
sender list. In doing some checking to see how I want to setup SA, I
noticed that currently many messages that look like spam are being
whitelisted by our current setup because of the bonded sender list.
What i
11 matches
Mail list logo
