On Monday 21 April 2008 06:27:57 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> The possibility of catering the reporting protocols to different sites
> (i.e. the major free sites have their own reporting systems that might be
> better used). It's beyond the scope of this thread, but are there any
> docs on h
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:39:29PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Can someone do a spam-versus-ham comparison for included links to
blogger.com (I don't have the corpus handy, nor do I know how to set up a
"proper" test.)
It's not really go
On Sunday 20 April 2008 18:39:29 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> A lot of the spam I'm seeing sneak past spamassassin has a blogger url in
> it (this seems to be a new favorite for spammers).
yep
> Can someone do a spam-versus-ham comparison for included links to
> blogger.com
well some "
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:39:29PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Can someone do a spam-versus-ham comparison for included links to
> blogger.com (I don't have the corpus handy, nor do I know how to set up a
> "proper" test.)
It's not really going to help you, you'd need to know the #
> A lot of the spam I'm seeing sneak past spamassassin has a blogger url in it
> (this seems to be a new favorite for spammers).
>
> I've got about 200 such spams that have managed to sneak past (no idea how
> many of the 2 spams in my confirmed-kills folder also match).
Same deal.
> So, that
Hello all,
A lot of the spam I'm seeing sneak past spamassassin has a blogger url in
it (this seems to be a new favorite for spammers).
I've got about 200 such spams that have managed to sneak past (no idea how
many of the 2 spams in my confirmed-kills folder also match).
So, that said:
