On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, guenther wrote:
> Also, since you are specifically aiming at *large* mail, keep in
> mind that there usually is a max size for mail to be scanned at
> all. IMHO SA is not the best candidate for this kind of "gathering
> logs".
Agreed. You might be better served just by analysi
Please resist the urge to top-post.
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 06:17 -0700, dougp23 wrote:
> You are right. I don't want to block the mail, but I do want to assign a
> high enough value to it that it would be marked as spam. In this way, I can
> then go to management and show them how much spam this
;<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Block-a-user-based-on-content-tf3525541.html#a9836724
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:30 -0700, dougp23 wrote:
> I have a user IN the company, who loves to forward these large messages,
> things like "Check out these so cute puppies", and "Photoshop Magic" and
> what not. Pure drivel.
>
> Anyway, Can I tell SA to "block sending email from jsmith" when "mut
dougp23 wrote:
> I have a user IN the company, who loves to forward these large messages,
> things like "Check out these so cute puppies", and "Photoshop Magic" and
> what not. Pure drivel.
>
> Anyway, Can I tell SA to "block sending email from jsmith" when "mutliple
> jpgs attached" or something
quot; or something like that?
I would appreciate any hints!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Block-a-user-based-on-content-tf3525541.html#a9835974
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
